Skip to main content

A spokesman for Saint Mary’s University in Halifax says senior administrators were shocked after seeing a video of students in a frosh-week chant condoning non-consensual sex with underage girls.

INSTAGRAM

A spokesman for Saint Mary's University in Halifax says senior administrators were shocked after seeing a video of students in a frosh-week chant condoning non-consensual sex with underage girls.

Steve Proctor says the "sexist and offensive" chant posted on Instagram was led by student orientation leaders at the campus.

Proctor says the Labour Day incident occurred just days after senior school administrators and police met with student union officials and orientation organizers stressing the importance of discouraging sexism and sexual assault during frosh week.

Story continues below advertisement

"We were surprised," he said in an interview.

"The senior director of student services had met with the [student] executive and the organizing committee … and spoke about these very issues and the need to be respectful."

He says the student union has apologized for the incident and promised the chant will no longer be part of frosh week activities.

Proctor said he was uncertain of the precise history of the song, but added a less sexist version had been sung on the campus in the past.

He said this year's version, which states Saint Mary's male students prefer non-consensual sex with underage girls, was more sexually charged than earlier chants.

"It's certainly the last year the chant will be sung," he said.

He says all of the student leaders involved in orientation week and the three members of the student union executive will take sensitivity training.

Story continues below advertisement

The student executive will also attend a conference at St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, N.S., and make a presentation at Saint Mary's University about the issue of consent and sexual assault, said Proctor.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies