Skip to main content

Canada Government to rebuild immigration detention facilities in Vancouver, Laval

Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Ralph Goodale speaks during question period at Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday, March 24, 2016.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Immigration holding facilities in Vancouver and Laval, Que., will be replaced as part of a $138-million overhaul intended to improve detention conditions for newcomers to Canada.

The federal government will also move ahead with plans to expand the range of alternatives to locking up immigrants, with the aim of making detention a last resort, said Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale Monday during a visit to the aging Laval facility.

In addition, a community supervision program will be developed for released detainees.

Story continues below advertisement

The Canada Border Services Agency holds people who are considered a flight risk or a danger to the public and those whose identities cannot be confirmed.

But the Canadian Red Cross Society has found numerous shortcomings at facilities for immigrant detainees, including overcrowding and lack of mental health care.

Newcomers are often held in provincial jails or police facilities alongside suspected gang members and violent offenders.

The Red Cross said the border agency detained 10,088 immigrants — almost one-fifth of them refugee claimants — in 2013-14 in a variety of facilities, including federal holding centres and provincial and municipal jails. Among these were at least 197 minors, held an average of about 10 days each.

Of the three federal detention centres, the government has flagged the Laval facility, which dates from the 1950s, and the short-term holding centre at the Vancouver airport as most in need of attention. One in Toronto is considered to be in better shape.

The government says the planned changes mean only the highest-risk detainees will remain in provincial facilities.

Some of the new money will go to mental health and medical services for detainees in federal holding centres.

Story continues below advertisement

Beginning this summer, the government will hold consultations on finding more alternatives to detention — such as electronic monitoring — and reducing the number of minors behind bars.

The Liberals don't want detention to be "the only game in town," Goodale said.

British Columbia Civil Liberties Association executive director Josh Paterson called the federal plans "very encouraging." However, he said, it would be a backward step if the rebuilt facilities prompt officials to detain more people.

The End Immigration Detention Network welcomed the government's acknowledgment of problems, but it said new laws and policies are needed — not revamped holding centres — to remedy unfairness in the system. The network wants a limit of 90 days on detentions.

An average of 450 to 500 immigrants are detained at any given time, the government says.

Several people have died in border services agency custody, including two in Ontario last March.

Story continues below advertisement

In December 2013, Lucia Vega Jimenez, 42, tried to kill herself while held by the border agency in British Columbia. She was taken to hospital and died days later.

Last month close to 60 immigrants in two Ontario prisons began refusing food to protest their detention.

Goodale said Monday the hunger strike reflected "the pressures within the system" — ones the government is trying to address.

The Liberals will look at an array of alternatives including community supervision and surveillance, electronic monitoring and telephone reporting that makes use of voice-recognition technology. The government will ensure public safety is not compromised, Goodale added.

Paterson said the civil liberties association would put forward ideas. "Our preference is to use every other means than detention."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter