Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Contents from a tailings pond is pictured going down the Hazeltine Creek into Quesnel Lake near the town of Likely, B.C. Tuesday, August, 5, 2014. The pond which stores toxic waste from the Mount Polley Mine had its dam break spilling its contents into the Hazeltine Creek causing a wide water-use ban in the area.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/The Canadian Press

More than 50 organizations called on governments Tuesday to implement the recommendations of an independent report to prevent mine waste leaks similar to the Mount Polley disaster in British Columbia as provincial and territorial ministers gathered in Halifax for a meeting.

In a letter to 13 ministers, the groups ask that governments implement the recommendations released in January by an independent expert panel, which reviewed the massive tailings leak.

Twenty-four million cubic metres of mine waste flowed into area lakes and waterways last August after a breach of the tailings dam at the central B.C. mine. The report found the dam was built on a glacial lake deposit, which caused the weakened structure to burst.

Story continues below advertisement

At the Energy and Mines Ministers' Conference in Halifax on Tuesday, B.C. Energy and Mines Minister Bill Bennett said the incident at Mount Polley was discussed at the meeting and other provinces are taking a look at the report.

"I think there is concurrence across the country that we need to learn from what happened," said Bennett at the meeting's closing news conference, adding that his province has already committed to adopting all of the report's recommendations.

"I believe that all of the provinces are having a look at it. Some provinces are already doing some of the things that are noted in the report."

Ugo Lapointe of MiningWatch Canada, one of the groups who signed the letter, said it's encouraging to know the Mount Polley incident was part of the meeting's agenda.

But Lapointe added that the meetings were behind closed doors, so any outcomes of those discussions are not publicly known. He said that leaves him with many questions.

"What we heard today... is at least now all Canadians ministers are aware of that disaster and they are aware of the independent expert panel report recommendations," said Lapointe just after the two-day meeting closed.

"Now we'll have to be careful in the following weeks and months to see if other provinces and territories across Canada are implementing those recommendations."

Story continues below advertisement

Bennett recently appointed a committee to determine how to best enact the report's seven recommendations in his province, which include improving engineering practices and strengthening regulatory operations.

Some of the report's other recommendations include creating an independent tailings review board and maintaining a detailed tailing dams and facilities inventory database, the group's letter said.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies