Skip to main content

Collège de Maisonneuve in Montreal is photographed on March 12 2015.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

A Montreal junior college is trying to determine how to accommodate a student who was prevented from taking an exam because she wouldn't temporarily remove part of her hijab, a school spokeswoman said Monday.

The young woman was asked by her male biology teacher two weeks ago to pull back part of her Islamic headscarf so he could see whether she was wearing headphones, said Line Legare with College de Maisonneuve.

"She didn't want to show him her ears," Legare said, adding the student offered her teacher the possibility of touching her through the hijab to make sure she wasn't trying to cheat.

Story continues below advertisement

"That made the teacher uncomfortable."

He then told the student she couldn't take the exam that day.

Legare noted the teacher made it clear at the beginning of the school year he reserved the right to ensure students weren't wearing headphones before exams.

"Whether the student had a tuque, a hat, or lots of hair," Legare said, the teacher had written in his course outline he would ask students to show him their ears, a policy she said was condoned by the biology department.

Legare said the teacher and the student are negotiating another date for her to sit the exam.

She said to her knowledge the student hasn't filed a formal complaint and added the school is looking at ways to ensure future "misunderstandings" aren't repeated.

Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard was asked Monday about the incident and replied the teacher "used his judgment" to ensure there was no suspicion of cheating.

Story continues below advertisement

"From what I hear, the exam will take place," he said in Montreal. "I think this shows that people on the ground are best-placed to manage these questions."

He added his government has introduced a bill regarding religious accommodation "and we'll have the chance to have a debate on these issues."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies