Skip to main content

Ontario's so-called "deal with the devil" will ensure that Karla Homolka escapes prosecution in the drug-rape death of her sister when she's released from prison this summer, the Ontario government reiterated yesterday.

"I'm not going to go back and second-guess the decision, that's for sure," Ontario Attorney-General Michael Bryant said.

"That was something that was looked at some years ago and it was reviewed as well by a public inquiry. The decision was made . . . at the time to leave things as they were."

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Homolka secured a 12-year prison sentence for manslaughter in 1993 after entering into a plea bargain with Ontario Crown officials.

While she was never charged in the 1990 Christmas Eve death of 15-year-old Tammy Homolka, her sentence took the incident into account.

Two years later, Ms. Homolka testified against her former husband Paul Bernardo. He was found guilty of all charges against him, including the sex slayings of two Ontario schoolgirls and the death of Tammy Homolka.

Between Ms. Homolka striking her deal and Mr. Bernardo's trial, startling videotapes documenting the couple's crimes were handed over to authorities. The tapes emboldened critics, who accused Ontario of signing a "deal with the devil."

A public inquiry into Ms. Homolka's plea bargain ensued, but the agreement stood.

"This is something an attorney-general of the day made a decision based upon the public inquiry that was before him, and that's that," Mr. Bryant said.

Instead, the Ontario government vows to pursue what it calls its best legal recourse to protect the public from Ms. Homolka.

Story continues below advertisement

In mid-June, an application will be made before a Quebec Provincial Court judge to limit Ms. Homolka's freedoms under the Criminal Code, but there's no guarantee any restrictions will be granted.

Despite that, the lawyer representing the families of slain Ontario schoolgirls Kristen French and Leslie Mahaffy agrees the Criminal Code is their last available defence against Ms. Homolka. Revisiting past crimes is not an option.

"At the time of the plea bargain, they agreed that the facts relating to Tammy Homolka would be read into the record and form part of the reasons for the sentence," Tim Danson said.

"I don't doubt for a moment that legally, if there was a way, they would [charge her]"

Tammy's death aside, Mr. Danson believes the government officials passed up their chance to quash the "deal with the devil" long ago.

Before Mr. Bernardo's 1995 trial, Ms. Homolka told authorities about a sexual assault on a woman known only as Jane Doe. That information wasn't offered earlier as part of her plea bargain.

Story continues below advertisement

"I advocated that she had breached her plea bargain because she hadn't disclosed it," Mr. Danson said.

"That's the opportunity that we missed."

Despite Mr. Bryant and Mr. Danson's appraisal of the legal situation, former Ontario justice minister Bob Runciman believes the recommendations of the public inquiry are worth examining.

The Jane Doe case and the possibility that Ms. Homolka committed perjury were left open for the Conservative government of the day to consider, said Mr. Runciman, now Conservative House leader.

"Those are areas that could still be, I believe, considered by the current Attorney- General."

Mr. Bryant says he recently scrutinized the inquiry's report and believes restrictions under the Criminal Code represent the best chance his government has to rein in Ms. Homolka.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.