Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Justice Clement Gascon, writing for the majority, said the judge who ordered the costs award had sent a clear message that abusive conduct will not be tolerated.

The Canadian Press

The Supreme Court of Canada says judges have the power to punish criminal defence lawyers who try to delay trials by ordering them to pay the financial costs of the delay.

The 7-2 ruling came in a case involving veteran lawyer Robert Jodoin of Granby, Que. In 2013, a Quebec Superior Court judge had awarded court costs of $3,000 against Mr. Jodoin, at a prosecutor's request, after he tried to have two separate judges recused for bias on the same day, and made a flurry of other motions. The Superior Court judge said he had committed abusive conduct in an attempt to obtain a postponement of the trials of 12 people facing drunk-driving charges. The Quebec Court of Appeal threw out the costs award, saying the lawyer's behaviour was not so rare and exceptional as to deserve the punishment.

But the Supreme Court majority said judges have the authority to combat the problem of delay, and appeal courts should not interfere in the exercise of that unless the lower-court judges act unreasonably.

Story continues below advertisement

Justice Clément Gascon, writing for the majority, said the judge who ordered the costs award had sent a clear message to the players in the judicial system that abusive conduct will not be tolerated. Justice Gascon cited the Supreme Court's ruling in a case from last summer known as R v Jordan, an attempt to tackle the problem of clogged courts and years-long trials. The Jordan ruling created strict time limits for criminal trials, resulting in upheaval in the justice system in which, among other things, courts have dismissed charges against four men accused of murder over unreasonable delay.

"The judge's comments were consistent with the principles recently enunciated by this Court in R. v. Jordan, in which the majority denounced, among other things, the culture of complacency toward delay that impairs the efficiency of the criminal justice system," Justice Gascon wrote. He added that the cost awards will usually be small, because judges will dismiss the abusive attempts at delay quickly.

Several intervenor groups, including the Criminal Lawyers Association, had sought to persuade the court that defence lawyers need manoeuvring room to defend their clients aggressively without fear of financial punishment.

Frank Addario, a Toronto lawyer who represented the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, said the ruling could have a chilling effect on defence lawyers. Five judges out of the 13 who heard this case said the behaviour was not exceptional enough to deserve punishment (three appeal court judges and two on the Supreme Court), he said, so the standard expected from lawyers is unclear.

"How is a defence lawyer who is told, 'Be courageous, fight as hard as possible, make every argument,' supposed to know?" he said in an interview. "I'm afraid young defence lawyers, reading that, will tilt toward timidity: 'I won't raise novel arguments.'"

Justice Rosalie Abella and Justice Suzanne Côté, writing in dissent, said they agreed with the majority that courts can order costs against lawyers who abuse the rules, but said they also agreed with the Quebec appeal court that Mr. Jodoin's actions, while improper, were not exceptional. Some of what Mr. Jodoin sought to do was reasonable, they said.

"The desire to make an 'example' of Mr. Jodoin's behaviour does not justify straying from the legal requirement that his conduct be 'rare and exceptional' before costs are ordered personally against him," the two dissenting judges wrote.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Jodoin could not be reached for comment.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies