Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Stephen McNeil speaks to the media in Halifax on Oct. 9, 2013.

PAUL DARROW/The Globe and Mail

Nova Scotia's premier distanced himself Thursday from a government legal brief that implied members of a First Nation band are a conquered people.

The brief was presented as part of the government's case in an appeal of its approval of a plan by Alton Gas to store natural gas in salt caverns near the Shubenacadie River.

In the appeal hearing that wrapped up Tuesday before the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, the Indian Brook band argued that the province had a duty to consult with it on the project.

Story continues below advertisement

The government brief said the Crown's obligation to consult extended only to "unconquered people," and that the band's submission to the Crown in 1760 negated its claim of sovereignty and negated government's constitutional duty to consult.

Premier Stephen McNeil, who is also minister of aboriginal affairs, said the government's intent was to show in court that it did consult with the band.

"I believe that brief went way beyond where it needed to go," said McNeil. "I am looking for an explanation from the (Justice) Department."

McNeil also said he believes the provincial government has an obligation to consult with First Nations when it comes to major project proposals.

"All we should have been doing is talking about the work we did, it had nothing to do with any treaty or what happened in 1700. I believe Sipekne'katik (Indian Brook) should be upset ... and I will be speaking with them and seeing chiefs next week."

Justice Minister Diana Whalen said there are a "myriad" of court cases being dealt with by the department at any one time and she doesn't look at all of them.

Whalen said she didn't sign off on this particular legal brief.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'll be asking more about what the process is and to be sure that we are more sensitive because this has a big implication clearly. We value our relationship with the First Nations and it is not what we as a government . . . would have wanted to be the major argument."

Naomi Metallic, chair of aboriginal law and policy at Dalhousie University, said she is happy to hear the premier publicly distance himself from the government's court argument, but she wonders how the brief slipped through the Justice Department in the first place.

"Somebody I would assume higher up at some point had some clue about what was in here (the brief)," Metallic said. "Why wasn't this caught earlier and what are they going to do about it in the future?"

The proposed project would create two massive natural gas storage caverns near Stewiacke, N.S., by using large amounts of river water to flush out the salt. The brine would then be released into the river system over a period of two to three years.

The province granted approval in January and subsequently dismissed appeals from six groups including the Indian Brook band, which then took the case to the province's supreme court.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies