Skip to main content

Canada Manitoba judge's husband takes blame for nude photos

A Manitoba judge under investigation for alleged sexual harassment was unaware that sexually explicit photos of her were on the Internet, occasionally accompanied by personal ads seeking group sex, her husband testified Tuesday.

"She had no idea until the middle of June, 2003, that I had posted any pictures on the Internet," Jack King told the Canadian Judicial Council inquiry, now into its second week of hearings.

"It was essentially in pursuit of some absolutely bizarre sexual behaviour on my part."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. King, a lawyer, has already admitted to taking 100 to 150 nude photos of Lori Douglas before she became a judge, some of them showing her in bondage gear or performing sex acts. Mr. King used the photos in 2003 to harass a former client named Alexander Chapman and asked him in conversations and e-mails to have sex with his wife.

Mr. King pleaded guilty to professional misconduct last year and was ordered to pay the Law Society of Manitoba $13,650, but retains his licence to practice law.

Judge Douglas faces a much steeper penalty. The inquiry panel could recommend that she be removed from the bench. She was appointed a judge in 2005 and rose to become associate chief justice of Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench.

But Mr. King and Judge Douglas have maintained all along that Judge Douglas never knew what her husband was doing until the matter blew up in 2003. That's when Mr. Chapman complained to the law firm where Mr. King and Judge Douglas both worked and Mr. King paid Mr. Chapman $25,000 to settle the matter and keep quiet.

In 2010, Mr. Chapman went public and filed a complaint against Judge Douglas with the judicial council, alleging she was part of the harassment.

Mr. King testified Tuesday that Judge Douglas knew nothing of his actions. He was secretly engaging in behaviour that he described as "bizarre, ridiculous, stupid, self-indulgent, grotesque and so on."

Mr. King took the explicit photos of Judge Douglas between 1996 and 2003. Some were on an instant camera in the couple's bedroom, some were taken outdoors with a digital camera and some were taken with a 35-mm camera that required negatives to be developed at an acquaintance's house, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Judge Douglas was a willing participant in the photography, but never asked to look at the photos or even inquire as to whether they were being kept or destroyed, Mr. King said.

"I don't believe she ever put her mind to it. She never asked me any questions at all about it."

In 2002, Mr. King uploaded about 30 of the photos to a website dedicated to interracial sex. The photos were accompanied by messages which said the couple was looking for group sex.

Mr. King again said it was all him, and Judge Douglas knew nothing.

"I had a fantasy about a threesome of an interracial nature," Mr. King said, adding that he did not get any responses to the ad.

The lawyer leading the inquiry, Guy Pratte, questioned Mr. King as to whether Judge Douglas was truly uninvolved. He pointed out the online messages used the term "we."

Story continues below advertisement

"Anyone reading either one of those ads … would have the understanding that your wife was consenting," Mr. Pratte said.

"No. She did not," Mr. King replied.

Mr. Pratte also pointed out that in a court affidavit, Mr. King had said the photos were intended for "our private use," and asked Mr. King whether that was a sign that Judge Douglas was aware that he had kept the photos.

No, Mr. King replied, the affidavit was poorly worded.

"I was careless, essentially, in proofreading this," he said.

In July, 2003, Mr. King went to lunch with Judge Douglas and told her what he had done.

Story continues below advertisement

"She was absolutely distraught and horrified. The anger came later," Mr. King said.

"She was devastated and, frankly, so was I."

Judge Douglas soon became concerned that the photos could wipe out any chance she had of becoming a judge. She had first applied in 1999 and had submitted a second application in 2003.

"There were times when she expressed that the scandal may have had an impact on her chances," Mr. King said. He added that the couple did not discuss it much because "I didn't want to be reminded in any way of that."

In November, 2003, Judge Douglas met with Associate Chief Justice Gerald Mercier and apparently discussed the scandal and her chances of becoming a judge.

"Had meeting with Gerry Mercier. Felt like I'd run a marathon," Judge Douglas wrote in her diary, which is being used as evidence at the inquiry.

Story continues below advertisement

"Frankly, had had to reconcile myself that there is simply no chance. I hope I can really forgive Jack."

The inquiry is examining four allegations against Judge Douglas:

- that she sexually harassed Mr. Chapman;

- that she failed to disclose the issue when she was screened for a judicial appointment in 2005;

- that she didn't fully disclose some facts to the inquiry and changed a 2003 entry in her personal diary in 2010;

- that the photos have undermined confidence in the justice system and her ability to act as a judge.

Story continues below advertisement

Through her lawyer, Judge Douglas has denied all the allegations. She is expected to testify as early as the end of this week. Judge Douglas and Mr. King, who have one child together, have remained married despite Judge Douglas's anger at the matter.

Judge Douglas's lawyer, Sheila Block, has asked the inquiry panel not to penalize Judge Douglas for her husband's betrayal.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Cannabis pro newsletter