Skip to main content

Canada More children whose parents don't have a degree are completing university: StatsCan

Having parents who attended university has always been a strong predictor of a child's likelihood to secure a degree, but a recent study suggests that gap is narrowing.

The Statistics Canada study found that people whose parents didn't graduate from university are nearly twice as likely to get a degree today than they were more than two decades ago.

The study found that in 2009, 23 per cent of people whose parents didn't get a university education held a degree, up from 12 per cent in 1986.

Story continues below advertisement

The 2009 General Social Survey attributes the shrinking disparity in university completion by family background to women.

In 1986, only 10 per cent of women whose parents were not university graduates held a degree. By 2009, that proportion nearly tripled to 28 per cent.

But Martin Turcotte, a senior analyst at Statistics Canada who authored the study, said there was a significant increase in the number of women with highly educated parents who got degrees, too.

"Really the fact that more women from all types of families get degrees contributed a lot to the decreasing gap," said Mr. Turcotte.

Despite the increase there's still a sizable difference between the two groups, with a person whose parents hold a degree much more likely to complete university.

"The gap is still important," said Mr. Turcotte. "People with parents who have a university education are twice as likely to get the degree themselves, compared to other people."

The study also found that parents' educational achievements have less of an impact on the children of immigrants. Those children are even more likely than the kids of Canadian-born parents to complete university.

Story continues below advertisement

"There's some literature that shows that immigrants have higher expectations for their children's education than Canadian-born parents," said Mr. Turcotte.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter