Skip to main content

The Roman Catholic Church’s 1455 and 1493 papal bulls granted 15th-century explorers permission to explore and conquer the New World.

GREGORIO BORGIA/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission is weighing whether to ask the Vatican to repeal the Papal Bulls of Discovery that granted 15th-century explorers the right to conquer the New World and the "heathen" aboriginal people that called it home.

Chair Murray Sinclair says the commission examining the impact of Canada's residential schools is looking carefully at the 1455 and 1493 Catholic edicts as part of its final report.

Many argue the proclamations legitimized the treatment of aboriginal people as "less than human." Crown sovereignty in Canada can be traced back to those papal bulls and neither Canada nor the United States has repudiated them, Sinclair said.

Story continues below advertisement

"The movement to repudiation is very strong and is moving ahead," Sinclair said in an interview. "If we as the commission are going to join that movement or endorse it … we have to come to a conclusion that it's necessary for reconciliation, to establish a proper relationship between aboriginal and non-aboriginal people."

A growing chorus in Canada is calling on the Vatican to help begin a new relationship with aboriginal people on equal footing.

The discovery bulls, and others in the same vein that followed, gave Catholic explorers "full and free power, authority, and jurisdiction of every kind" and outlined their "duty to lead the peoples dwelling in those islands and countries to embrace the Christian religion."

If aboriginal people refused, the Vatican granted its envoys the authority to enslave and kill.

If the commission recommends the bulls be rescinded, Sinclair said, it has to weigh the legal implications, which could strike at the core of Crown sovereignty over land.

"What would be the basis for rationalizing Crown sovereignty if the Doctrine of Discovery is no longer available?" Sinclair said. "We have to consider that question and perhaps give some direction about how that relationship can be re-established in a proper way … on a nation-to-nation level."

The United Nations appointed a special rapporteur in 2009 who found the bulls lie "at the root of the violations of indigenous peoples' human rights." The edicts have resulted in the "mass appropriation of the lands, territories, and resources of indigenous peoples," the UN found. They also form the legal basis of many modern-day land claim disputes, it said.

Story continues below advertisement

Keith Matthew, former chief of Simpcw First Nation in British Columbia, has been quietly building support in Canada for their repeal. He recently got the support of the Assembly of First Nations, which passed a resolution at its December meeting endorsing the revocation of the bulls.

It's about hitting the "reset button on our relationship," Matthew said.

"The papal bulls put us in a position no better than animals," he said. "We know better today. We're just as civilized and human as anyone else in this world. It's really about righting a historic wrong.

"I'm no animal. I'm a person, a human being."

Hayden King, director of the Centre for Indigenous Governance at Ryerson University, said simply calling for the edicts to be repealed isn't enough for reconciliation.

He said it would be more significant if the government recognized its sovereignty was based on a "fairy tale" that aboriginal people are not human and further recognized aboriginal title to land.

Story continues below advertisement

"Unless there was corresponding action, it would seem kind of hollow."

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter