Skip to main content

As one of the commissioners put it yesterday, how can it be that the commission given the historic task of helping Canada toward a national reconciliation on Indian residential schools was ultimately unable to reconcile with itself?

Justice Harry LaForme's sudden resignation as commission chair Monday, in which he cited an intractable power struggle with the other two commissioners, has at a single stroke thrown the entire process into doubt. One native group, Ontario's Anishinabek Nation, said yesterday it has lost confidence in the commission and that the two remaining commissioners must be fired.

The commission's unravelling was swift, according to Jane Brewin Morley and Claudette Dumont-Smith, the two women who Judge LaForme said repeatedly challenged his authority and vision, dooming the group to failure.

Story continues below advertisement

The three commissioners met fewer than six times since they were appointed in June, they said. The last meeting was on Aug. 26, when Judge LaForme left abruptly, saying he was unwell. He cancelled a meeting for the following day, and thereafter refused all meetings and insisted that Ms. Dumont-Smith and Ms. Morley communicate with him only through intermediaries, the two women said.

They had to work through e-mails sent to commission lawyers, who would then pass them on to Judge LaForme. Judge LaForme was following what he called a medically supervised schedule, but which other sources referred to as stress leave.

The impasse continued through September as Judge LaForme found himself blocked by what he saw as Ms. Dumont-Smith and Ms. Morley's determination to outvote him on every issue. Then Judge LaForme, an appeals court judge, turned to Ontario's Chief Justice Warren Winkler for help.

In an attempt to broker a truce between the feuding commissioners, Chief Justice Winkler dispatched Will McDowell, a Toronto lawyer and former associate deputy minister of justice.

Ms. Dumont-Smith and Ms. Morley said they were shocked to learn that Judge LaForme had obtained a court-appointed mediator, without informing them first.

The three of them met with Mr. McDowell on Sept. 30 in the Bay Street offices of Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP. It was described as an introductory meeting, civil in tone, but it was clear the parties had significant differences.

Judge LaForme felt that as chair, he was in charge. The two commissioners felt all three should be equals, according to a person familiar with the process.

Story continues below advertisement

"I'm a lawyer, but I'm also a mediator, and one of the problems here is that we didn't have enough interaction," said Ms. Morley. "I believe that whatever issues there may have been we could have worked through them. But that wasn't the case. I respect Justice LaForme's decision and am saddened by it. He had his reasons and we'll move on."

Judge LaForme declined an interview request, but in his letter of resignation he said a major stumbling block was that the other two saw the commission as primarily about finding truth, and less about reconciliation. The two women deny that charge.

In Ottawa, Assembly of First Nations National Chief Phil Fontaine urged the government to find a replacement for Judge LaForme as soon as possible.

While John Beaucage, grand council chief of the Anishinabek Nation of 42 Ontario native communities, called for all three commissioners to be replaced, Mr. Fontaine repeatedly avoided any criticism of the other two commissioners.

"We insisted that there be three commissioners. We never contemplated that there would be one commissioner [who]was more important than the other two commissioners," Mr. Fontaine said.

"It was always seen as a commission that operated on the basis of consensus."

Story continues below advertisement

At Mr. Fontaine's side at the news conference was former student Bill Wuttunee of Calgary, who expressed a clear sense of hostility toward Judge LaForme's decision.

"Just because one person quits, [it]doesn't mean there's a disaster," said Mr. Wuttunee, who in 1961 became the first chief of the National Indian Council, which later became the AFN.

"It just means that he probably wasn't qualified to handle the job in the first place. He obviously talks about his health in that letter, if you examine it carefully, and that's a big issue: Did he have the enthusiasm to work in that position or was he too lazy? That's the question."

Judge LaForme was also criticized by leaders from the Nishnawbe Aski Nation of Northern Ontario. Although they initially supported his appointment, they were critical of the decision to name Owen Young as senior counsel to the commission. Mr. Young was crown counsel in the legal standoff that saw six members of the Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug First Nation go to jail for blocking a mining exploration company. Mr. Young resigned from the commission at the same time as Judge LaForme.

Judge LaForme declined the opportunity to respond.

*****

Story continues below advertisement

Replacing Harry LaForme

Harry LaForme was the unanimous choice of the committee that waded through the 300 candidates to lead the truth and reconciliation commission.

Now, another chair must be found.

Sources familiar with the file say Manitoba Queen's Bench Judge Murray Sinclair, who led the province's Aboriginal Justice Inquiry, is on the list, as is Ontario Judge Todd Ducharme, who is Métis. Other names mentioned include Georges Erasmus, co-chair of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, and Roberta Jamieson, head of the National Aboriginal Achievement Foundation. Staff

Claudette Dumont-Smith

Claudette Dumont-Smith is a former nurse who has worked in the native health-care field for more than 30 years. Before joining the commission, Ms. Dumont-Smith, an Algonquin from Quebec, was an adviser on health issues to the Native Women's Association of Canada.

She said contrary to Mr. LaForme's claims of a power struggle among the commissioners, the three never discussed whether the commission should be governed by consensus, by majority rule, or at the chairman's discretion.

"I was very saddened by the turn of events," she said. "I personally thought I had a good working relationship with him and I feel even now that he was a good commissioner." Staff

Jane Brewin Morley

Jane Brewin Morley is a lawyer and mediator from British Columbia, and the only non-aboriginal member of the commission.

She was the Child and Youth Officer for B.C. from 2003 to 2006, where she says she saw the intergenerational impact of residential schools.

Ms. Brewin Morley said she plans to stay on as commissioner after Justice Harry LaForme's resignation.

"The nature of the work we're doing requires a team approach," she said. "If you have two commissioners consistently voting against the chair, that wouldn't work. I have no concern about trying to work through that though." Staff

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter