Skip to main content

An NDP supporter snaps a selfie with NDP leader Tom Mulcair as he rallies in Edmonton, Alberta on Thursday, September 10, 2015.

Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press

The New Democrats' campaign promise to bring tens of thousands of Syrian refugees to Canada generated a popular reaction last week from within party ranks: aim higher.

Many NDP partisans approached by The Canadian Press at leader Tom Mulcair's rallies wanted their party to increase its election pledge to resettle 46,000 people over four years from the devastated region.

Several called on the NDP to double it.

Story continues below advertisement

"A country this size can afford to bring on a lot more people like that who are suffering – at least 100,000 and do it quick," said longtime party member Jim McLaren, who attended a Mulcair event in Edmonton.

"I appreciate that's a better number than the Tories, but let's get it up to 100,000. We could absorb them very easily."

Earlier this month, images of a dead Syrian toddler on a Turkish beach grabbed the attention of Canadians and launched an emotional debate over how best to help some of the four million refugees desperate to escape the Middle Eastern country.

That discussion immediately spilled over onto Canada's campaign trail, where it suddenly emerged as a top issue.

In January, the Conservative government announced it would accept 10,000 refugees over three years. Since last month's election call, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper has committed to open the country's doors to another 10,000 people over the next four years.

So far, Canada has resettled fewer than 2,500 Syrians.

Feeling pressure to do more, the Harper government announced Saturday it would match "eligible" donations – to a maximum of $100-million – made by Canadians between Sept. 12 and Dec. 31 to registered charities working to help Syrian refugees.

Story continues below advertisement

The Tories are also expected to announce a plan in the coming days to help accelerate the slow bureaucratic process of bringing refugees to Canada.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau has promised to welcome 25,000 Syrian refugees by New Year's Day.

Mulcair's promise of 46,000 over four years includes accepting 10,000 refugees by the end of 2015 and another 9,000 annually for the next four years.

The NDP says their figure is based on a United Nations calculation that says the Canadian government should sponsor 9,000 Syrian refugees over the next four years as its share of the world's resettlement efforts. The NDP says the total estimated cost of the plan is $329.2-million.

But for many NDP supporters who attended Mulcair rallies last week – that number isn't ambitious enough.

For a party that has always existed on the left side of the spectrum, partisan pressure on the refugee promise could be a consequence of the NDP's apparent shift toward the centre with the aim of capturing more votes.

Story continues below advertisement

When asked why the NDP isn't promising to bring in more refugees, NDP spokesman Karl Belanger said the party will also make it easier for Canadians to assist refugees.

"There would (be) no cap on the number of privately sponsored refugees – we shouldn't put up barriers to Canadians' generosity," Belanger wrote in an email Sunday.

None of the supporters interviewed said they were so concerned with the party's position that they would change their vote over the issue.

But at least one tried to personally deliver his message to Mulcair.

At a Toronto rally, Hamed Shajari worked his way through a large crowd jockeying for a chance to meet Mulcair.

But unlike others in the adoring crowd, Shajari wasn't hoping to snap a selfie with the NDP leader.

Story continues below advertisement

"Tom! Tom!" Shajari shouted through the blaring rock music toward Mulcair, who was greeting supporters after his stump speech.

"Forty-six thousand is low – low."

Mulcair, who probably couldn't hear Shajari over the music, looked in his direction, gave him a thumbs up and shook his hand.

Shajari, who was raised in Iran during the country's war with Iraq, held up his other hand as if to signal he was expecting an answer from Mulcair, who continued through the throng.

"I grew up in a war, eight years of war, so I know how bad it is," said Shajari, who also noted that Germany agreed to accept at least 500,000 people from Syria.

"When he announced 46,000, I really believe it's very, very low," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Among NDP supporters, Shajari wasn't alone.

"It's a good number. I wouldn't mind seeing more to be honest with you," said Edmonton's Mary Elizabeth Archer, a card-carrying NDP member since 2004.

In Peterborough, Ont., party supporter Martha Tancock said the 46,000 figure "just doesn't really touch the problem at all."

"In a way, I wonder why they choose a number at all," Tancock said.

"Why don't they just say, 'We'll get as many in as we can and as fast as we can'?"

Mani Singh, a party member, said he would like to see Canada bring in at least 100,000 refugees over 10 years.

Story continues below advertisement

"I see that as a very good start," Singh said of the NDP target after the Toronto event.

"I think that Canada, with our potential, our current wealth, our economic capacity, we can handle much more than that."

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter