Skip to main content

Was this year's budget terrific or terrible? We asked Globe and Mail readers to rate eight policies from the 2013 budget, ranging from the tariff deductions to infrastructure spending.

Have your say at tgam.ca/rate-budget

78 per cent of respondents thought the new federal markets regulator was "good" or "terrific," the most favourable policy on the list.

Story continues below advertisement

31 per cent thought the decision to eliminate the Canadian International Development Agency was a "terrible" idea, making it the unliked policy.

40 per cent viewed the new whistleblower reward negatively. The reward pays whistleblowers 15 per cent of reclaimed unpaid taxes if they help catch a tax evader.

68 per cent of all respondents thought the policies were "good" or "terrific" overall, while 32 per cent thought they were "bad" or "terrible."

On cutting the Canadian International Development Agency:

"Trying to put humanitarian aid in the hands of the same group looking out for business interests is monstrous."

-- Jim Johnstone

On infrastructure spending:

Story continues below advertisement

"Not sure why the federal government overtaxes, then forks out funds back to provinces and municipalities. Shouldn't they just reduce federal taxes and expect the lower levels to raise their own infrastructure funding?"

-- Patrice Boivin

On a new federal regulator:

"This is very important. It is unfortunate that provincial efforts to date have not obtained this result. Canada's international credibility will be greatly improved while the cost of administering and policing our capital markets will reduce."

-- Bill Cowan

(The poll was based on more than 2,000 votes, with each policy registering an average of 251 respondents.)

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies