Skip to main content

Ada Lockridge of the Aamjiwnaang First Nation, in an area known as “Chemical Valley” near Sarnia, Ont., first secured a commitment in 2009 from the Ministry of the Environment to review how air pollution is regulated where there are multiple emitters.

CRAIG GLOVER/CP

A resident of a southern Ontario First Nation surrounded by industrial facilities is taking the provincial government to court to demand it complete an air quality review promised eight years ago.

Ada Lockridge of the Aamjiwnaang First Nation, in an area known as "Chemical Valley" near Sarnia, Ont., first secured a commitment in 2009 from the Ministry of the Environment to review how air pollution is regulated where there are multiple emitters.

Currently, the ministry only considers the emissions of one particular facility when issuing approvals and orders, not any cumulative effects from various facilities.

Story continues below advertisement

The Environmental Bill of Rights sets out a legal duty for the ministry to complete a review like the one promised to Lockridge "within a reasonable time."

Eight years is not reasonable, Lockridge argues.

"I don't know if they're waiting for me to die or what, but I'm still here and I haven't given up yet," the 54-year-old said in an interview.

Lockridge submitted the 2009 application to protect all Ontario communities with significant sources of industrial air emissions, but also to protect herself, her daughter, and her community, her lawyer Kaitlyn Mitchell writes in the application for judicial review.

"The closest industrial sources of air contaminants to Aamjiwnaang are adjacent to the reserve and across the street from important community institutions," the application says.

Aamjiwnaang residents have long complained of high rates of asthma, headaches, learning and behavioural problems in children, and miscarriages.

A 2005 study of Aamjiwnaang birth records found that baby girls outnumbered boys by a two-to-one ratio. Tests performed years later by a McGill University professor suggested a possible link to pollution when he found that mothers and children were being exposed to higher-than-average levels of harmful hormone-blocking pollutants.

Story continues below advertisement

Three years ago, after Ontario's environmental commissioner raised the issue of the — then five years-delayed — review, Environment Minister Glen Murray said he would look into it immediately.

The ministry now says its review will be complete and made public this fall. In a statement it noted that data from the local air monitoring station indicates that contaminants have decreased over the period.

Lockridge is skeptical, saying the one monitoring station doesn't provide enough information, for example what is in the air at a given time when there is an incident at a nearby facility.

"They average it out for the whole year so we can't even tell the days it was really bad," she said. "I always have to question a lot of the things they say."

Dianne Saxe, the current environmental commissioner, said she has asked the ministry about the review nearly every month for the past year and a half.

"For the people who breathe in that community, it doesn't matter where the pollution comes from," she said in an interview. "They are affected by the total level of contaminants."

Story continues below advertisement

The ministry has been busy lately, implementing two major pieces of legislation on waste and cap-and-trade, Saxe conceded.

"I certainly have some sympathy for the ministry staff, who I know are working hard on a very difficult issue," she said. "But when it comes right down to it, eight years is just outrageous."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies