Skip to main content

Rachel Capra Craig wrote a touching tribute to her disabled daughter days before she poisoned her.

"In loving memory of my most dearest daughter Chelsea, the most beautiful girl in the world," it read.

Ms. Capra Craig then fed her daughter a concoction of drugs that killed the 14-year-old while she lay in bed in their suburban Montreal home. Ms. Capra Craig, a woman who'd suffered a lifetime of depression, then tried to kill herself.

Story continues below advertisement

At her first-degree murder trial yesterday, she was found not criminally responsible for killing Chelsea Craig, whose death last March opened a debate about the pressures of caring for disabled children. Yesterday, the child's death was depicted instead as the act of a paranoid and psychotic woman unable to tell right from wrong.

"This is not a Latimer case. It's not a mercy killing," psychiatrist Renée Fugère testified, referring to Robert Latimer, the Saskatchewan farmer who killed his severely disabled daughter, Tracy, in what he described as an act of compassion.

Ms. Capra Craig, 47, had become convinced that the child's father was sexually abusing her. Although her beliefs were unfounded, she decided to kill Chelsea to spare her the imagined abuse, court heard.

Ms. Capra Craig had suffered throughout her life from neglect and isolation, and caring for her daughter was an added stress, court was told. Chelsea had a neurological disorder called Rett Syndrome, which brought life-threatening seizures, as many as 15 diaper changes a day, and spoon feedings.

"You had to be on constant lookout for death. It was a matter of life or death all the time," Dr. Fugère told Mr. Justice Fraser Martin of Quebec Superior Court. "This is the way Mrs. Craig felt . . . it was a constant preoccupation.

Ms. Capra Craig is to be sent for psychiatric help at a Montreal hospital.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter