Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Quebec Justice Minister Stephanie Vallee

Jacques Boissinot/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Quebec's groundbreaking right-to-die law has cleared a major hurdle after the province's top court sided with the government in allowing doctors to legally end a patient's life.

The ruling by the Quebec Court of Appeal means the first law of its kind in Canada remains in effect – and it is already being invoked by patients. Quebec Health Minister Gaétan Barrette told The Globe and Mail a patient suffering from terminal cancer asked about applying the law this month. However, no procedures to end the patient's life were initiated.

Dr. Barrette said Tuesday's court ruling marks a significant step in allowing Quebec patients the right to make their own choices.

Story continues below advertisement

"This judgment says Quebec has the right to offer patients a continuum of care at the end of their life," he said. "This is a judgment in favour of citizens. We shouldn't see it as a victory for the government." Several provinces have started to seek information from Quebec as they look at drafting their own possible laws, he said.

The ruling from Quebec's three-member appeal court clears up the legal uncertainty shrouding the province's medically assisted dying law since earlier this month. On Dec. 1, the Quebec Superior Court temporarily suspended the law and declared it inoperative until the Criminal Code ban on assisted death is lifted.

But the appeal court overturned the decision, stating that the lower court erred in saying that federal laws took precedence over Quebec's initiative. Quebec's law falls under health care, which is a provincial matter, and the legislation sets up strong guidelines that limit its risks.

Ottawa has already indicated it sees value in Quebec's law. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau this month praised Quebec's "responsible and rigorous approach to such a delicate and sensitive topic."

The federal government is seeking "a uniform criminal law for all Canadians," Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould said in a statement on Tuesday.

"We recognize the leadership that Quebec has demonstrated in developing its own legislation on physician-assisted dying," said Christian Girouard, a spokesman for Ms. Wilson-Raybould. "We will continue to work with Quebec, as well as the other provinces and territories, to develop a co-ordinated approach to physician-assisted dying across the country."

All eyes now turn to Ottawa to see how it will accomplish that. The Supreme Court of Canada struck down the Criminal Code ban on physician-assisted death last February, but it suspended the effect of its ruling for 12 months to allow the federal government and the provinces time to draft legislation.

Story continues below advertisement

Ottawa is seeking a six-month extension that would bring the deadline to August. Arguments for the extension are to be heard next month.

Dying With Dignity Canada opposes any further federal delays and says the Quebec court ruling may have repercussions across the country. Canadians who want medically assisted dying wonder why they have to wait "when Quebeckers have the right to die today," said Wanda Morris, the head of the group.

"This is a truly remarkable day that clears the path forward for Quebec residents to openly request compassionate assistance to die," she said in a statement. "There is no longer any legal ambiguity. Health-care providers in [Quebec] should feel comforted knowing that their government and their top court support this critical health-care treatment."

Quebec's law is still facing legal challenges. Paul Saba, a Montreal family doctor who has led the fight against the law, said he will challenge Quebec's end-of-life legislation on its merits beginning next month. He said Quebec's initiative amounts to euthanasia. "Euthanasia is not medical care – it never has been and it never will be," Dr. Saba said in an interview.

The law lacks adequate safeguards and the province should instead work on improving access to palliative care across Quebec, he said.

Dr. Barrette said Quebec has reached a consensus on the issue. "We've had the debate in Quebec and we listened to the population. People want this choice," the minister said. He cited numerous safeguards provided by the law and said the rules are "very strict."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies