Skip to main content

Taxi drivers demonstrate as a legislature committee studies the legality of Uber, Thursday, February 18, 2016 at the legislature in Quebec City.

Jacques Boissinot/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Uber should start respecting the law before it asks for legislative reforms that suit its interests, Transport Minister Jacques Daoust said Thursday during the first day of hearings into the future of the taxi industry.

Daoust said the ride-hailing company has an unacceptable attitude and continued to level stinging criticism at Uber during the legislative committee hearings in Quebec City.

"It's been a thousand times we've seized your company's vehicles and you say: 'The law doesn't apply to me, I won't listen to it.' You are not looking for a solution, you are looking for a confrontation and you risk receiving one," Daoust said.

Story continues below advertisement

Sitting across from him during the hearing was the head of Uber in Quebec, Jean-Nicolas Guillemette, who also received sharp rebukes from other politicians on the committee.

Daoust told Guillemette that if his company wanted the government to create rules governing ride-sharing services to work alongside the traditional taxi industry, he would have to start respecting the state.

"The legislature, it exists to make laws," Daoust said. "You're in the house where we make laws and what you're saying is: 'Until I like the laws I won't respect them,' and for me, sir, that's unacceptable. We will be the ones to impose a model on you."

Earlier on Thursday Daoust said Uber should publicly disclose data that would permit the Quebec government to recoup taxes from the ride-hailing company since it began operating in the province.

"When we're talking about 300,000 (monthly) transactions, that's a lot of money that should be taxed," Daoust said.

He told members of the legislature he plans to introduce a bill aimed at clarifying the rules governing the province's taxi business because of the arrival on the scene of the American-based tech company.

The legislative hearings are scheduled to last several days amid increasing tensions between cabbies and Uber drivers.

Story continues below advertisement

Taxi drivers are seeking a permanent injunction against Uber that would force its mobile application to be deactivated.

The industry has said Uber drivers are breaking the law and that the company's services are illegal.

Taxi company owner, Alexandre Taillefer, testified in front of the committee Thursday and called for greater control over Uber drivers.

"We are strongly against contraband taxis," he said. "However, if the government wishes to allow amateur taxis, it is imperative that the rules are fair, especially when it comes to taxes."

Taillefer said drivers who hold taxi permits — which can cost up to $200,000 each —should have the exclusive rights to medical and adapted transit, curbside hailing and taxi stands.

He also asked lawmakers to relax rules that prevent taxi owners from gathering their own fleets of cars, as well as other assets and licences in sufficient numbers to create economies of scale.

Story continues below advertisement

Uber argues its mobile app, which connects its drivers to customers, makes it a technology firm rather than a transportation company.

At a news conference Thursday, Guillemette, said he and many of his drivers have been victims of intimidation tactics by the taxi industry.

He also pointed to a recent 50,000-signature petition in favour of Uber as proof of the company's popularity.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter