Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Rania El-Alloul poses in her neighbour's home in Montreal on Feb. 27, 2015.

Christinne Muschi/The Globe and Mail

A judge's decision to deny a woman's day in court because of her hijab goes against the principles of Canadian law, another Quebec tribunal has ruled.

But Superior Court Justice Wilbrod Decarie also said that although Rania El-Alloul's treatment was regrettable, he could not guarantee she would be allowed to wear her hijab during future court appearances.

El-Alloul's lawyers had been seeking a legal opinion that would clarify the rights of Quebecers who want access to justice while wearing religious attire.

Story continues below advertisement

Globe editorial: Religious freedom: As Canadian as hockey, beer and saying 'I'm sorry'

Related: Quebec judge who demanded hijab removal needs a Charter lesson

They had asked for a declaration that El-Alloul's right to freedom of religion had been violated and that she has the right to be heard in court wearing her hijab or other religious attire.

In February 2015, Quebec court Judge Eliana Marengo told El-Alloul her case involving the province's automobile insurance board and her impounded vehicle would not proceed as long as she was wearing the hijab.

She refused to remove it and the judge put off the case. It was ultimately settled when the car was returned.

In his decision handed down earlier this week, Decarie wrote that Marengo's argument at the time — that the courtroom should be a secular space — went against the principles of Canadian law protecting freedom of religion.

He said Marengo's decision restricted El-Alloul's right to exercise her "sincere religious beliefs" without any compelling reason to do so.

Story continues below advertisement

"The court sympathizes with her and greatly regrets the way she was treated," he wrote.

But his ruling does not mean El-Alloul or other women will be able to wear hijabs at future court appearances.

"Each case must be evaluated in light of the context that exists during the witness's appearance," he said. "We cannot declare in advance, absolutely and without context, that El-Alloul will have the right to wear the hijab during future appearances before the court of Quebec.

"Nobody can predict the future."

Decarie said he could not make the declaration El-Alloul was seeking, partly because her case became moot when her vehicle was returned to her.

He also concluded there is no evidence Quebec court judges systemically refuse to allow testimony from women who wear hijabs.

Story continues below advertisement

In a statement, El-Alloul said the entire experience had been difficult for her and her family.

"It was important for me to hear another judge agree that it was wrong and should not have happened," she said. "I continue to hope that no one will ever be treated like I was."

Julius Grey, El-Alloul's lawyer, said he was happy with the finding that the original judge had been wrong, but expressed disappointment Decarie stopped short of affirming women have a right to wear a hijab in court.

Grey said he will likely appeal the decision.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies