Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The RCMP has admitted that an employee fabricated a response to an access-to-information request.

Supt. David Vautour says the employee acted in a manner that was contrary to the Mounties' core values and has been disciplined.

The fabrication came to light last week in a letter Vautour sent to Bruce Cheadle, a reporter for The Canadian Press who, in May 2015, requested information regarding the now-defunct long-gun registry.

Story continues below advertisement

Cheadle did not receive a response to his access request until March 1, 2016, but that letter was backdated almost five months.

Vautour says a note included with the tardy response claimed that the letter had originally been sent to Cheadle in October 2015, but was returned to the RCMP by Canada Post due to an incorrect postal code.

He says the Mounties have since determined that the backdated letter and the explanatory note were fabricated to avoid a possible complaint about the delay in responding to the access request.

"Our office does not condone actions that are contrary to the RCMP core values of honesty, integrity and professionalism," Vautour wrote Cheadle.

"We want to advise you that we have addressed this matter through a formal disciplinary process and made the Office of the Information Commissioner aware of this matter."

In a phone call to Cheadle, Vautour also suggested that unspecified action would be taken soon to deal with the employee's supervisor.

The reporter has since lodged a formal complaint with Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault.

Story continues below advertisement

Ironically, Cheadle's original access request flowed from reporting on backdated legislation which retroactively absolved the RCMP of any wrongdoing when it illegally destroyed long-gun registry records in 2012, even as Legault was conducting an investigation into a complaint about access to those records.

Stephen Harper's previous Conservative government passed the Ending the Long-gun Registry Act in April 2012 and then pushed the Mounties to quickly destroy the data, despite assuring Legault that the records would be preserved until her investigation was completed, as legally required.

When Legault subsequently informed the government that the RCMP had committed an alleged offence, the Conservatives re-wrote the law, retroactively stripping Legault of her jurisdiction over the registry records, absolving the Mounties of any wrongdoing and shutting down an active investigation into the matter which had been started by the Ontario Provincial Police.

The backdated response to Cheadle's access request for copies of electronically scanned long-gun registration application forms and transfer applications informed him that the Access to Information Act no longer applied to the requested records.

Vautour says the substance of the response "was accurate," despite the fabricated date and explanation for the delay in responding.

Legault is supporting a court challenge to the constitutionality of the retroactive legislation, arguing that it undermines the rule of law and government access-to-information systems across the country.

Story continues below advertisement

However, the court case has been on hold for months as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's year-old Liberal government attempts to negotiate a resolution.

Quebec's long-gun registry data, which was not destroyed along with the rest of the country's, remains sealed under the court's protection pending the outcome of the dispute.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies