Skip to main content

Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall during an interview at The Globe and Mail with the Editorial Board, Toronto October 28, 2013. Saskatchewan’s NDP Opposition has been suggesting Mr. Wall’s should follow Alberta’s lead in creating private-public partnership funding for new schools.

Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail

Nine new Saskatchewan schools designed to be used jointly by Catholic and public boards are to be built using public-private partnership funding.

The province says the decision to go with the P3 model was made after consultations with outside experts.

The province will put out project descriptions for two bundles of schools to attract potential bidders — a maximum of three companies will be chosen to submit proposals.

Story continues below advertisement

One bundle will include three schools to be built in Regina; the other includes four schools in Saskatoon, one school in Martensville and one in Warman.

Construction is expected to begin next summer and finish in time for classes in September 2017.

The province says the projected cost to build the schools won't be known until a builder is selected.

"Financial analysis, conducted by external experts, demonstrated that a P3 model will deliver the best value for Saskatchewan taxpayers," Gordon Wyant, minister responsible for SaskBuilds, said in a release Thursday.

In June, the Alberta government announced it was dropping plans to finance 19 new schools using a P3 partnership. The province said it would cost $14 million more to do that than to use traditional financing.

Saskatchewan's NDP Opposition has been suggesting Premier Brad Wall's government should follow Alberta's lead.

A joint-use school is one where public and Catholic students could share things such as gymnasiums, practical and applied arts spaces, band rooms or daycares, but still have their own teaching space and staff. The idea is to share maintenance costs and save money.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies