Skip to main content

In November, freshly elected Liberal Premier Brian Gallant announced he would lower those barriers, saying women would no longer need two doctors to deem their pregnancies “medically necessary” before medicare would cover the cost of the procedure.

James West/The Canadian Press

New Brunswick's promised expansion of abortion services will be limited to a single new hospital – a hospital that is located in one of only two cities in the province that already offer publicly funded abortions.

The province's English-language hospital network confirmed Tuesday that it will begin terminating pregnancies in April at The Moncton Hospital, one of the organization's 12 hospitals across the province.

The news only came to light after a local media co-operative obtained an e-mail that John McGarry, the chief executive officer of Horizon Health Network, sent to a group of doctors on Jan. 21 explaining that providing "family planning services" at a single site made the most sense financially.

Story continues below advertisement

Until now, Horizon had refused to say where it planned to offer abortions, citing security and privacy concerns.

Horizon's decision is the latest bend in the road for women seeking to end their pregnancies in New Brunswick, which until recently had the highest barriers in the country to publicly funded abortions.

In November, freshly elected Liberal Premier Brian Gallant announced he would lower those barriers, saying women would no longer need two doctors to deem their pregnancies "medically necessary" before medicare would cover the cost of the procedure.

The move was prompted in part by the closing last summer of the Fredericton Morgentaler clinic, which prompted a national debate about abortion access in the Maritimes and outside major cities across Canada.

However, Mr. Gallant left intact a rule that restricted public funding to abortions performed in hospitals, something pro-choice advocates warned at the time might hinder access to the procedure.

"Before today, we knew there were and are only publicly funded [abortion] services in Moncton and Bathurst," said Jessi Taylor, a spokeswoman for Reproductive Justice NB, one of the groups that urged New Brunswick to drop its restrictions on publicly funded abortions.

"Now, RGNB has long said that providing services in only Bathurst and Moncton is a huge barrier to patients around New Brunswick. So doubling up services is inefficient and irresponsible."

Story continues below advertisement

In the Jan. 21 e-mail obtained by the website NB Media Co-op, Mr. McGarry wrote that his organization needed to balance "access with cost" in deciding where to offer abortions. He warned the capital costs for each site "could be in excess of $800,000" and wrote that, "We cannot afford that capital cost."

Mr. McGarry declined an interview request Tuesday. He confirmed in an e-mailed statement that The Moncton Hospital would, in fact, be the new site offering abortions beginning in April.

Ms. Taylor said the province could go a long way toward improving abortion access by paying for the service in clinics like the one that opened recently in the former Morgentaler building in Fredericton after a crowdfunding campaign raised more than $125,000.

New Brunswick is far from the only Canadian province where abortions providers are scarce outside of big urban centres.

Elsewhere in the Maritimes, Nova Scotia offers abortions at just one Halifax hospital and Prince Edward Island has no abortion providers at all.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies