Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Canada’s most-awarded
newsroom for a reason
Stay informed for a
lot less, cancel anytime
“Exemplary reporting on
COVID-19” – Herman L
per week
for 24 weeks
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Linda Redgrave, who accused former CBC radio host Jian Ghomeshi of sexually assaulting her, is seen outside the Ontario court of justice in Toronto on May 11, 2016.

Colin Perkel/The Canadian Press

Three months after a judge resigned for asking a rape complainant why she did not keep her knees together, the House of Commons has given unanimous consent to an opposition bill that would require training in sexual assault law, myths and stereotypes for anyone wishing to become a federal judge.

But the judicial establishment is skeptical about its usefulness amid questions about who will design the program, and what its content will be.

The bill, proposed by interim Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose, needs only Senate approval to become law. Opposition bills only infrequently become law in major areas of public policy, and the Liberals, who increased funding for judicial training this year, had dithered for weeks deciding whether to support the bill.

Story continues below advertisement

But in February, after a public inquiry, Justice Robin Camp of the Federal Court resigned over his conduct of a rape trial he conducted in 2014 as a member of the Alberta Provincial Court. Later, a Halifax judge acquitted a taxi driver of sexual assault, even though police had found the inebriated complainant unconscious in the taxi moments after the incident.

And more than 50 police forces across Canada have launched reviews of cases they had determined to be unfounded after a Globe and Mail investigation into police practices, all parties threw their weight behind Ms. Ambrose's bill.

"I think the bill is a great example of the power and currency of public concern over sexual assault," Carissima Mathen, a University of Ottawa law professor, said in an e-mail to The Globe. "I can't really think of a recent example in Parliamentary law-making that comes close." However, she expressed concern that building training requirements into the appointment process would delay the naming of new judges at a time they are badly needed to combat court delays.

The bill would impose mandatory training before candidates are considered for federally appointed courts such as the superior courts of provinces and the Federal Court. Ms. Ambrose said she designed the bill for candidates for the bench, rather than sitting judges, because of concerns about judicial independence.

Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould told the Commons on Monday the bill "would indeed improve training for lawyers in terms of sexual assault."

Judges are not so sure. Neil Wittmann, who retired earlier this month as chief justice of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, says that in Alberta, new judges attend a 4 1/2-month training program that includes a component in sexual-assault law. "That said, are there some people who don't get it?" he said in an interview last week with The Globe. "I guess there are, but isn't that true in any field of endeavour, and will training make them get it?"

He also said the bill is vague in requiring that candidates be trained to the satisfaction of the judicial affairs commissioner, the head of the agency that provides administrative services to federally appointed judges.

Story continues below advertisement

"Is he or she going to set their own criteria? Are they going to have an exam to see if you can pass? Is it going to be online training? Is it going to be sitting in a lecture for a couple of days? I think the concept is laudable, but like any other concept, the devil's in the details."

Organizations representing judges questioned the bill's usefulness at committee hearings this month and last. Leaders of the National Judicial Institute, the Canadian Judicial Council and the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs praised the "spirit" and goals of the bill, but said such training is already being provided to sitting judges.

Marc Giroux, deputy commissioner of the Office of the Commissioner of Federal Judicial Affairs, said more than 700 people have applied to be federal judges in the past six months. Given that number, such programs would either delay the process, or be brief and ineffective, he told the committee.

Adèle Kent, executive director of the National Judicial Institute, which trains federally and provincially appointed judges, told the committee she worries pre-appointment training will not be effective. "The real effectiveness of judicial training is that they are judges. They know they're in the seat."

Norman Sabourin, executive director of the Canadian Judicial Council, which represents chief and associate justices, raised concerns about judicial independence, saying the bill's focus on candidates rather than sitting judges "may be an attempt to do indirectly what you cannot do directly" – legislate the training requirements for the judiciary.

He added that, because the bill's objective is training, candidates should be required to sign an undertaking to take training in sexual-assault law, rather than take the training beforehand.

Story continues below advertisement

But University of Calgary law professor Jennifer Koshan, an expert in sexual-assault law who has led training sessions for Alberta judges, expressed a point of view that the Status of Women committee, and ultimately, the Commons, found persuasive.

"We are currently seeing a profound lack of confidence with respect to the justice system's handling of sexual-assault cases," she said. "I think it's crucial for us to keep in mind that sexual assault remains the most under-reported crime in Canada, resulting from many different barriers in the justice system. I believe training for all the players in the justice system is key to facilitating access to justice in sexual-assault cases."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies