Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The Supreme Court of Canada is seen in Ottawa, Monday October 17, 2011.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

One of the country's most active anti-abortion protesters lost an appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada on Friday.

By an 8-1 margin, the justices rejected Linda Dale Gibbons's argument that she should never have been charged under the Criminal Code for picketing too close to a Toronto abortion clinic.

The high court did not wade into the emotionally and politically charged abortion debate, but instead confined itself to a single, technical, legal point: whether Ms. Gibbons should be dealt with under criminal or civil law.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Gibbons maintains she should have been dealt with under civil law for disobeying a court order, not charged criminally.

She was charged under section 127 of the Criminal Code. She argued that she should have been entitled to an exemption under that section that would have taken her case out of the criminal courts.

The justices disagreed.

The ruling means she will go to trial if the prosecution decides to pursue the case.

The 63-year-old has been picketing abortion clinics for almost two decades and has spent a total of nine years behind bars intermittently.

She was arrested again last December for picketing too close to a clinic.

That arrest came just two days after her lawyer argued her case before the Supreme Court.

Story continues below advertisement

The case she lost on Friday dates back to 1994, when an Ontario court ordered her and others to stay more than 20 metres away from Toronto abortion clinics.

The injunction came six years after the Supreme Court struck down Canada's abortion law and two years after the Morgentaler abortion clinic in Toronto had been fire bombed.

In October 2008, Ms. Gibbons was charged with breaching the injunction for picketing and displaying a sign within the buffer zone.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies