Skip to main content

A rifle owner checks the sight of his rifle in this file photo.

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to rule Friday morning on whether Quebec has the right to obtain records from the now-abolished federal long-gun registry or whether Ottawa can destroy the records.

The case is important for the future of gun control in Quebec. The province wants to create its own gun registry, after the Conservative government closed the federal one in 2012, and it wants to use the information collected from Quebec gun owners for the federal registry.

Under the registry, owners of rifles and other long guns were subject to criminal prosecution if they did not register them with a firearms agency run by the RCMP. The government argued that the registry was ineffective at preventing crime and violated the privacy rights of licensed gun owners. A Liberal government created the registry, driven partly by demands for tighter gun controls after the 1989 massacre of 14 female engineering students at Montreal's École Polytechnique.

Story continues below advertisement

"We're now in the field of symbolic politics," University of Montreal law professor Jean-François Gaudreault-DesBiens said. Because of the massacre, gun control has come to be seen as a "Quebec value," and if Quebec loses this fight with Ottawa, separatists "will say, 'You see, Quebec values are different from the rest of Canada, and the Supreme Court is a tool in the hands of the rest of Canada.' "

The case is also important for a principle known as "co-operative federalism," in which the federal government and the provinces work together on mutual objectives. Quebec argues that this notion, inherent in Canada's Constitution but not actually written anywhere, obliges Ottawa to turn over the registry's data. If the argument succeeds, it would create a powerful lever for other provinces to use in discussions with the federal government on other issues such as health care or securities.

"It's a big moment for co-operative federalism," said Paul Daly, who also teaches law at the University of Montreal. "The Supreme Court has said quite a lot about this idea in recent years, but so far it's been mainly bark. We're going to find out if it has any bite and if it actually imposes serious obligations on partners in Confederation."

University of Sherbrooke law professor Maxime St-Hilaire said he would be surprised if the court rules in Quebec's favour: "The Supreme Court has been wary of handing down judgments that would bear significant consequences in terms of public finances."

The ruling comes as Canada heads toward an election, expected in October, with the ruling Conservatives hoping to make gains in Quebec.

The trial judge who heard the case ruled in Quebec's favour, but the Quebec Court of Appeal said the federal government had the right both to create the registry and to destroy it. Quebec appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter