Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The prestigious Royal College of Physicians in Britain has just delivered what can best be described as a ringing endorsement of e-cigarettes, saying they are "beneficial to public health" and the "public can be reassured that e-cigarettes are much safer than smoking."

In the process, the RCP also delivers a stinging rebuke to public-health officials who, for the most part, have taken the absolutist and moralist stand that vaping is as bad as smoking rather than an effective harm-reduction measure.

In its new, 200-page report, titled "Nicotine without smoke: tobacco harm reduction," the RCP's tobacco advisory group makes some sweeping conclusions, including:

Story continues below advertisement

  • E-cigarettes are not a “gateway” to smoking: Vaping is embraced almost exclusively by those who are using or have used tobacco;
  • Vaping does not “normalize” smoking: There is no evidence that never-smokers, and teens in particular, are drawn to e-cigarettes and will end up smoking as a result
  • E-cigarettes are, for many, an effective smoking-cessation tool and people are more likely to try quitting if vaping is available as an alternative;
  • The potential long-term harm of e-cigarettes is unknown but there is no question the harm is less than tobacco.

In fact, the blue-ribbon panel concluded that, all told, e-cigarettes are about 95-per-cent safer than cigarettes.

The controversy over e-cigarettes isn't going to go away. Not smoking/vaping is better than smoking/vaping – that's indisputable.

But public health officials, who generally embrace a harm-reduction approach over a "just say No" approach to tackling drug use have been strangely inconsistent when it comes to smoking.

With smoking, the attitude has always been: Even one puff is too many and that approach has carried over to vaping.

That black-and-white approach is not appropriate. We know that what is addictive in cigarettes is nicotine but what is harmful is the smoke, the by-products of combustion.

The major benefit of e-cigarettes is that they produce vapour, not smoke, markedly reducing the risks. There are, however, some ingredients other than nicotine in the vapour (largely due to the lack of manufacturing standards), but again, they are substantially less than the known risks of tobacco.

Of course, you still have your addiction to nicotine but nicotine is largely innocuous, much like caffeine. The biggest harm of e-cigarettes then is to your pocketbook because a vaping habit can be costly.

Story continues below advertisement

The RCP, in its report, is careful to say that there should be regulation, especially to protect children. But it says the regulatory strategy should focus on ensuring products are safe and standardized rather than discouraging their use by smokers.

Tobacco is lethal.

In Canada, smoking kills an estimated 37,000 people a year. It is a major cause of disability, health costs and premature death. You lose about three months of life expectancy for ever year of smoking.

Despite four decades of anti-smoking efforts, about 15 per cent of adults still smoke, some five million people.

Quitting smoking is really, really hard.

If we continue to embrace an abstinence-only approach, we will fail to help many people reduce how much they smoke and, ultimately, their ability to quit.

Story continues below advertisement

Until now, we have treated most smoking-cessation tools – other than laws like workplace bans – as medicine. You can, for example, get a nicotine patch, or nicotine gum to tamp down cravings.

What distinguishes e-cigarettes is that they are not viewed as medicine but a socially acceptable alternative to smoking, something that provides pleasure (or, at least, satiation of a craving) while reducing harm.

In a statement released with the report, Professor Jan Dacre, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said that the RCP has, since 1962, been advocating for better policies and services to help people quit smoking.

This report concludes that e-cigarettes do so, and bring us one step closer to the ultimate goal, a tobacco-free society.

"With careful management and proportionate regulation, harm reduction provides an opportunity to improve the lives of millions of people," Prof. Dacre said.

Embracing the use of e-cigarettes by smokers "is an opportunity that, with care, we should take."

Story continues below advertisement

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies