Skip to main content

Gulls are seen on fishing gear in Yarmouth, N.S., on June 15, 2016.

Andrew Vaughan/THE CANADIAN PRESS

More than 10 per cent of the world's population could face malnutrition within the next few decades due to falling fish catches, warns a new study.

The study, conducted by scientists at the University of British Columbia and Harvard and published Wednesday in Nature, combines data on fish populations and nutritional needs around the world. The results set off alarm bells about the continued effect that overfishing and climate change could have on human health – especially in developing countries where people are most reliant on fish for nutritional needs.

"It's not just a biodiversity issue; it's not just an economics issue," said the report's lead author, Christopher Golden, a researcher at Harvard. "We need to be really thinking through this third dimension, human health and well-being."

Story continues below advertisement

The research relies on data from UBC, which show that global fish catches have declined yearly by 1.2 million tonnes since 1996. According to the study, this is due in large part to "destructive fishing practices, industrial population, climate change and coastal development for urbanization and aquaculture."

If current trends persist, 845 million people – about 11 per cent of the world's population – could be facing deficiencies in zinc, iron or vitamin A by the year 2050, the study says. The study further estimates that for 19 per cent of the global population, up to one-fifth of their intake of certain essential nutrients, such as omega-3 fatty acids, comes from fish.

Developing countries in low-latitude areas – such as sub-Saharan Africa and southeast Asia – are especially vulnerable due to their reliance on fish for nutrition. This problem is further exacerbated because the same areas are at higher risk for illegal fishing, weak governance over fisheries and population pressures, according to the researchers.

Meanwhile, countries such as Canada play a significant role, said William Cheung, a professor at UBC's Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries and one of the researchers on the study.

"While the developing countries are nutritionally vulnerable, they are actually exporting fish to developed countries for their consumption," Mr. Cheung said.

"So for countries like Canada, we have to be conscious about the fish we are consuming, where it's from and how it may link to impacts on fish stocks and other countries."

Mr. Cheung said that whenever possible, consumers should ask questions about where their seafood is from and try to purchase from sustainable options – either from local sources or certified sustainable fisheries.

Story continues below advertisement

According to Mr. Cheung, previous studies of this nature have focused on how falling fish stocks have affected the availability of animal protein. But, he said, the micronutrients focused on in this study, such as omega-3 fatty acids, are much more difficult to substitute and strongly dependent on animals.

Deficiencies in these micronutrients have been linked to maternal mortality, child mortality and reduced immune functions, he said.

Meanwhile, farmed fish – at least at current levels – is not enough to counteract the trend, according to the study. This is in large part because much of that product, too, is going to developed countries.

"Where aquaculture is growing, much of it is aimed at wealthier consumers in domestic cities or in international markets, rather than rural local areas," the study said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.