Skip to main content

Afghan children greet a Canadian soldier with the 1st Battalion, The Royal Canadian Regiment, patrolling Salavat, Panjwayi district, southwest of Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Anja Niedringhaus/AP

Thesis

This series grew out of the question, where does the Canadian military go after Afghanistan? Would the Canadian public support a similar mission in the future? Should we return to a peace-keeping role? Beyond those issues, the series examined other aspects of the Canadian military. Some of those issues included:

  • How important is Arctic defence to our military strategy?

  • What role does the Canadian navy play and can its potential be realized without a significant equipment update?

  • How do governments go about winning public support for often messy and open-ended conflicts?

  • Canada has repeatedly said no to a mission in the Congo. Can we continue to neglect failing UN missions?

Most-viewed, most-discussed stories

Story continues below advertisement

  1. Canada's next battle Afghanistan has been a tough war for Canada, but this country's military has emerged as something the world desperately needs - a capable, credible force. More...

  2. Ships from the past power Canada's navy of the future Decades of neglect of the fleet threaten to undermine the navy's unique advantages for modern assignments. More...

  3. How much is Arctic security worth? Canada must decide if it wants to spend $16-billion for sophisticated fighter jets to patrol its northern boundary. Then add a link More...


Top scored Catalyst comment

The discussion should start with building a consensus on what Canada's strategic interests are and what role the military should play in supporting them. The debate must rise above partisan politics and any single minority ideology... MGAEdwards


Top scored Reader comment

Exactly the way it should be. Canada needs to play a constructive role in the world - seeking to reduce violence rather than contribute to it. Kjell Anderson


Expert panel debate: Most viewed video

Part 1: Has Canada failed in Afghanistan? Featuring defence analyst Peter Langille, Ret. Lt-Gen. Michael Jeffery and Globe reporter Campbell Clark. More...

Most viewed interactive

Story continues below advertisement

Scenes from Cold Lake. Images of life at CFB Cold Lake. View.. .

Most active live chat

What do Canadians think about the military? Featuring Nanos Research CEO Nik Nanos and Globe reporter Campbell Clark. More...

Most active poll and results

Will having a strong military be more or less important in the future?

Of 10,991 votes cast:

Story continues below advertisement

  • 48% More important

  • 26% Less important

  • 25% Same importance as today

Editorial

Canada has a moral duty to help where help from the international community is desperately needed; places like the Democratic Republic of Congo, where mass rape is being used as a weapon of war. The reality is that if Canada is to help continue to play a military role beyond its airspace and coastal waters, then it will need battle-ready soldiers and state-of-the-art weaponry. The Globe and Mail

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.