Skip to main content

The 'top secret' surveillance directives

In 2013, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association sued the federal government, alleging that a Canadian spy agency’s indiscriminate surveillance violated citizens’ constitutional rights against illegal search and seizure.

While that allegation is unproven, the BCCLA has been forcing into the public domain disclosures from Communications Security Establishment, the highly secretive “signals intelligence” agency conducting such surveillance. But now, the federal government is fighting to move the case behind closed doors.

To get a sense of what’s at stake, swipe back and forth on the following document, known as the CSE “metadata ministerial directive.”

This 2011 executive order effectively gave a legal green light to CSE surveillance. The version on the left is what was released to The Globe following an Access to Information request. The version on right is a much more illuminating document, disclosed in court filings as part of the BCCLA lawsuit.

The BCCLA version of the document spells out the government’s understanding of what constitutes metadata and the specific things intelligence analysts are to do with it.


 
 

The BCCLA version of the document shows how CSE is under orders to indiscriminately collect and share metadata with allied agencies. But also revealed is the order to scrub out any “Canadian identifying information” after the fact.


 
 

Because CSE doesn’t expose its operations to scrutiny from courts or to Parliament, edicts from the defence minister are given the weight of law. This 2011 directive was signed by Conservative cabinet minister Peter MacKay. It replaced a near identical one signed in 2005 by his Liberal predecessor, Bill Graham.


 
 
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Latest Videos