Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

A Toronto lawyer facing fraud and theft charges has been stripped of his licence after the Law Society of Upper Canada concluded he misappropriated more than $3-million of his clients' money, most of it belonging to a charitable foundation with long-standing links to the Toronto Rotary Club.

Over 2 1/2 years, the society said, Michael Ingram siphoned cash from trust funds he controlled and dispersed it to eight recipients, including his wife and his brother.

In all, there were more than 130 allegedly unauthorized transfers.

Story continues below advertisement

"The conduct in this case is egregious," said the LSUC, the body that oversees the province's lawyers.

"Over $3-million in trust funds were misapplied and over $2-million remains unpaid. ... The fact that over $2-million was taken from a charitable foundation is of particular concern."

Police say the cash was funnelled to the United States, Canada, Bermuda and Switzerland, possibly beyond, and where the money trail ends remains guesswork.

One of the clients was a charity. Although the law society does not name it in the ruling, it was the defunct Laughlen Centre, a long-term-care facility for seniors that the City of Toronto bought in 2006 for $8-million.

Mr. Ingram, 69, was charged in July of this year with theft over $5,000 and fraud over $5,000 and has a court appearance set for next month.

He has declined comment, and a message left on Friday with the lawyer who represented him at the LSUC disciplinary hearing, Nadia Liva, was not immediately returned.

The society found it "troubling" that Mr. Ingram did not attend the hearing.

Story continues below advertisement

Of the $8-million the city paid for the centre, about one-third was to have gone to the centre, which, until it ceased operations in 2004, was home to more than 200 residents.

The balance covered outstanding debts and mortgages.

Mr. Ingram, a former partner with the downtown law firm Coutts Crane Ingram, had been the charity's lawyer and had headed its board of directors.

In 2008, he was fired by Coutts Crane, to which he had belonged for 38 years, after the discrepancies came to light.

Coutts Crane also reported him to the law society, and in July of that year, Mr. Ingram agreed to cease practising law.

On learning its share of the funds was missing, the Laughlen Centre's board members in August, 2010, launched a lawsuit against Mr. Ingram, four of his former colleagues at Coutts Crane and three associates, seeking more than $2.5-million in lost funds, plus $1-million in punitive damages.

Story continues below advertisement

The suit accused the law firm of failing to supervise Mr. Ingram adequately and thereby being "vicariously liable" for the alleged theft.

The defendants denied that.

"CCI had reasonable safeguards in place to protect the funds in its trust account, which Ingram unilaterally and surreptitiously circumvented," their statement of defence read.

The defendants agreed to settle the suit for $1.5-million.

And because the Laughlen Centre had by then ceased to exist except as a legal entity, the money was paid via a liquidation firm to the Rotary Club, a greatly respected secular organization that had for years helped administer the centre and provide financial support.

For the same reason, the Rotary Club is named in the criminal investigation as the chief victim of Mr. Ingram's alleged theft, along with at least two smaller, unspecified charities.

Story continues below advertisement

The law society found that during the period spanning October, 2005, to May, 2008, Mr. Ingram shuffled the money between different trust accounts, and disbursed it to a range of beneficiaries, including overseas law firms, and at least one religious organization, The Glorious Praise Ministries.

As well, his brother received more than $100,000 to assist in a real estate venture, the law society wrote.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies