Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A proposed new marina for mega-yachts in Victoria's harbour hasn't been built yet - and may never be - but there are already a lot of oars in the water.

So many, in fact, that opponents of the plan are wondering whether the project is being handled in a fair and transparent manner.

Consider, for example, the involvement of two top Conservative ministers from British Columbia who have conflicting views on the sanctity of the federal government's review process.

Story continues below advertisement

Last March 19, Stockwell Day, Minister of International Trade and Senior Regional Minister for B.C., wrote to John Baird, Minister of Transportation, to express unbridled support for the Victoria International Marina proposal.

"In these difficult economic times we should be assisting local businesses wherever we can. This project continues to be a potential economic generator and will no doubt mean more jobs to the local area once operational. I ask that you help make this proposal a reality as soon as possible," he stated.

Contrast that with the views of Gary Lunn, the Minister of State for Sport and the MP for Saanich-Gulf Islands, who on Oct. 13 wrote to Roger Patterson, a critic of the proposed project.

"I am given to understand that in this instance Transport Canada must review the plan under the Navigable Waters Protection Act. It would be inappropriate for me, as a Member of Parliament to politically interfere with this process," stated Mr. Lunn.

These letters and other documents, released by the Environmental Law Centre at the University of Victoria, have raised an obvious question. Why is it "inappropriate" for Mr. Lunn to interfere in the process, but okay for Mr. Day?

Perhaps the answer is that Mr. Lunn is sensitive to criticism because of his close ties to the developer.

Mr. Lunn's fundraising chair is Bob Evans, vice-president of Community Marine Concepts, which is jointly pursuing the marina with WAM Development Group.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Lunn's riding president is Jo-Anne Bilodeau, whose brother is Conservative Environment Minister Jim Prentice. (Opponents of the marina asked Mr. Prentice to order an environmental assessment by an independent review panel, but he refused.)

And Mr. Lunn's campaign manager in 2008 was Bruce Hallsor, a Victoria lawyer and federally registered lobbyist for WAM Development.

Last year, Mr. Hallsor discussed the marina with Lawrence Cannon, who was then transportation minister. Although he is not registered as a provincial lobbyist, he also met with Stan Hagen, when he was B.C. tourism minister.

In a letter to Mr. Hallsor, Mr. Hagen states: "At our meeting on January 23, 2007, you outlined a proposal for a high-end marina capable of berthing 80-foot to 120-foot yachts. … We support [these]plans to initiate tourism activity in the Victoria harbour, and look forward to hearing more about these exciting developments."

Mr. Hallsor, together with Mr. Evans, also met in 2007 with B.C. Finance Minister Colin Hansen, which raised some concerns among ministry staff.

"I understand that Hon. Stan Hagen, Minister of Tourism Sports & the Arts, sent a letter of support to the proponents," Todd Bailey, an official, wrote in an e-mail to a colleague. "Perhaps I am reading this meeting wrong, but I suspect that Community Marine Concepts will likely be seeking a letter of support from our Minister as well."

Story continues below advertisement

Then Mr. Bailey asked this question: "Is it normal for proponents to 'shop around' their project to Ministers during an ILMB process? … Call me so we can discuss."

ILMB stands for Integrated Land Management Bureau, and the note was expressing concerns that the minister was being lobbied when the project was under provincial review.

Given his links to the proponents, Mr. Lunn was correct to avoid interfering politically in the process. But he has raised suspicions by failing in his letter to mention his ties to the proponent, and by communicating on Sept. 30 with Mr. Hallsor, the WAM lobbyist. Federal records state: "Subject matter of the communication - sports."

The communication may well have been about the impact the marina would have on rowing and kayaking in Victoria harbour. But when a minister gets lobbied by his own campaign manager, who is acting for his fundraiser, it certainly looks bad. No wonder opponents of the marina are questioning the government's objectivity on this issue.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies