Skip to main content

An oil spill from the train wreck flows into Lake Megantic at Lac-Mégantic, July 8, 2013.

MATHIEU BELANGER/REUTERS

The environmental impact of the explosion at Lac-Mégantic is uncertain as authorities haven't confirmed the type of oil that was spilled.

Quebec estimates that 100,000 litres of oil spilled into the Chaudière River and another 1.5 million litres of oil-and-water mixture have been extracted from the river.

To put the spill estimate in perspective, the rupture of the Enbridge Inc. pipeline in Michigan in 2010 sent 3.3 million litres of heavy crude oil from Alberta's oil sands spewing into the Kalamazoo River.

Story continues below advertisement

The impact at Lac-Mégantic is difficult to assess, experts say, in part because authorities have not confirmed what type of oil the 72-car train was carrying when it derailed and exploded early Saturday.

"We're not even sure of the real product inside," said Robert Reiss, a professor of risk management at Sherbrooke University who formerly worked with Environment Canada's emergency management unit. "If it's heavy crude, there will be an effect on the environment, especially the fishes and the vegetation along the river bank."

Lac-Mégantic's sloping topography may prove to have limited the damage on land. Oil that did not burn or evaporate likely would not have had enough time to saturate the ground before flowing into the river.

"We don't think the oil got into the soil," said Mélissa Généreux, a spokeswoman for the area's regional health department. "We think it stayed on the surface."

Lac-Mégantic remained under a boil-water advisory on Monday, as firefighting efforts and a broken downtown water main stressed the system.

Christian Blanchette, the co-ordinator for Environment Quebec, said the town's air quality would be acceptable by late Monday and that the government was planning to allow the 1,500 or so evacuees to re-enter their homes in phases.

Many homes will need a cleaning. The ministry warned that some houses were caked with toxic soot and dripping with yellow oil.

Story continues below advertisement

With a report from Kim Mackrael

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter