Skip to main content

With an election looming and potential billions in long-term spending to be handed out, approach to the 2015 budget a critical piece of every party’s platform.

Thinkstock

Parliament's return next week is set to trigger a frenzy of high-stakes lobbying as work heats up on a federal budget that will include billions in new spending and tax cuts.

In a sign of this budget's heightened importance, the House of Commons finance committee has received 418 reports from groups and individuals with recommendations, up from 364 the year before. The committee plans to launch its prebudget hearings later this month, which is much sooner than in the past.

The weeks of hearings will provide a public glimpse of the arguments government officials are hearing behind the scenes, as hundreds of causes and campaigns attempt to win over cabinet ministers and their political aides.

Story continues below advertisement

For a Conservative government trailing in the polls, the 2015 budget is an opportunity for the Tories to tell Canadians what they would do with another mandate, says Stanley Hartt, a former deputy minister of finance who served as chief of staff to prime minister Brian Mulroney. Mr. Hartt was among the 16 individuals invited to a closed-door policy retreat with Finance Minister Joe Oliver last month to discuss the budget.

"If the vision offered by the incumbent government is sufficiently attractive, it is a page turner," Mr. Hartt said in an interview. "If they do it right, I don't think that people are necessarily going to get tired of them."

Conservative MP James Rajotte, who chairs the finance committee, confirmed that prebudget hearings will start this month; last year they began in early November. Budgets are normally tabled in February or March.

With a fixed election scheduled for October, 2015, the budget effectively becomes a Conservative campaign platform.

Just how much the Conservative government will have to spend is a matter of debate. Mr. Oliver recently moved to play down expectations, pointing out that the last budget estimated the size of the 2015-16 surplus at $6.4-billion. That budget also forecast a cumulative surplus of $32.9-billion between 2015-16 and 2016-19, giving the government the option of making larger, more long-term announcements.

At some point this fall, Mr. Oliver will release a fiscal update that will revise the government's forecasts as to how much room the government has to spend.

Former Department of Finance officials Scott Clark and Peter DeVries recently wrote in ipolitics.ca that the return to surplus could come in the 2014-15 fiscal year – beating the government's timeline by a year – and that the early surplus could be as large as $7-billion.

Story continues below advertisement

Planning for surpluses would mark a significant change from the last three budgets, which were devoted to spending restraint in order to climb out of the deficits created by the massive stimulus spending in the 2009 and 2010 budgets.

Opposition MPs have long been skeptical of the finance committee's prebudget hearings, arguing the real decisions are made in the Prime Minister's Office and that unwelcome recommendations are ignored by the Conservative majority when it comes time for the committee to write a report.

Nonetheless, NDP finance critic Nathan Cullen said there will be two conversations hanging over the public discussions between MPs and witnesses at committee: the budget and the 2015 election. Mr. Cullen noted that the hearings provide his party an opportunity to ask experts about ideas that, if not adopted in the budget, could reappear in the NDP election platform.

"We see enormous opportunity in hearing from Canadians and experts to pull in some of the ideas we will be offering the public in the coming year," he said.

Michèle Clarke, who helped write one of the 418 prebudget submissions as government relations director for Colleges and Institutes Canada, said her group has not had a hard time arranging meetings with officials to discuss the budget.

"On the skills side," she said, "I think there will be some appetite to be able to consider some new programs, new initiatives, things that I think will resonate with industry."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter