Skip to main content

Quickly now: What do the following have in common? No Googling necessary.

  • London Health Sciences Centre ($20,000)
  • Ontario Library Association ($10,000)
  • The Learning Partnership ($10,000)
  • Waterloo Catholic District School Board ($15,000)
  • Ontario Public Service Employees Union ($20,000)
  • Charity of Hope, Hamilton ($15,000)
  • Algonquin and Lakeshore Catholic District School Board ($15,000)
  • Kincardine District Secondary School ($10,000)
  • Queen’s University ($12,000)
  • Literacy for Life, Saskatoon ($20,000)
  • Canadian Mental Health Association, Halton region ($20,000)
  • Grace Foundation, St. John ($20,000)

First, they are all not-for-profit organizations.

Second, they never have as much money as they'd like.

Story continues below advertisement

Third, they are presumably meticulous with their expenditures.

Fourth, their budgets depend on governments, private charity or hard-pressed members.

Fifth, they all paid a huge fee – from $10,000 to $20,000, as shown in the brackets – to a sitting Member of Parliament to speak to them.

Sixth, that MP was Justin Trudeau.

I'm not sure what's more outrageous: that these organizations shelled out very big bucks to have an MP address them – and if I were involved in any of them I'd want heads to roll – or that this MP didn't have the good sense or ethical sensibility to decline.

On the contrary, since becoming a Member in 2008, Mr. Trudeau has raked in $277,000 in speaking fees from 17 speeches.

Let me try to be fair here. We wouldn't know any of this if Mr. Trudeau hadn't voluntarily disclosed to the Ottawa Citizen a great deal of personal financial information. This included not only his speaker's fees but also his inheritance from his father, worth about $1.2-million in 2012. Kudos to him.

Story continues below advertisement

As well, his speaking gigs were, to my surprise, approved by the Parliamentary Ethics Commissioner, Mary Dawson. Still, it left the decision to his own judgment, which is precisely the issue here.

Mr. Trudeau seems to have been a remarkably successful professional speaker before being elected, in one year pulling in fully $462,000. Good for him. As a private citizen he was entitled to squeeze what he could from organizations that invited him to speak, though some of us on the speakers' circuit have always been reluctant to take fees from community or charitable groups. Again, it's a question of judgment.

That MPs must not charge a red cent to speak to charities and not-for-profits should go without saying, though obviously it does need saying. What about private companies? Since becoming an MP, Mr. Trudeau has also been paid handsomely to speak to several of them. Businesses are of course free to use their funds as they choose. Still, morality is surely on the side of NDP MP Pat Martin who insists that "It is absolutely untoward and inappropriate for MPs or senators to charge a speaker's fee. I'm paid handsomely to be a Member of Parliament and if I'm invited to speak … that's one of my duties to share that with civil society, free of charge, gratis."

That handsome MP's reward includes a $157,731 annual salary plus $25,850 in accommodation expenses plus 64 round-trip plane trips. At a time when fewer and fewer Canadians make a secure, livable wage or get any benefits and pension at all, this must seem like winning the lottery. But for MPs outside the cabinet, it's just the beginning. Yet speaking to a school board, university or hospital means being paid a second time from the public purse, a clear case of double-dipping by any standard.

Yet Mr. Trudeau accepted such engagements from the time he was elected until the time he decided to run for party leader. It's hard to understand how someone on an MP's salary, who also happens to be worth more than a million dollars, can rationalize taking large speakers' fees.

Mr. Trudeau does himself no favors when he claims that when he speaks at such events, he doesn't talk politics. What else does a Member of Parliament do? He explained to the Ottawa Citizen that his topics include youth issues, education and the environment. Was this a joke?

Story continues below advertisement

It's quite something to assert with a straight face that these are not political issues. If you happened to be your party's parliamentary critic for youth, can you even open your mouth on "youth issues" without being political? And if you are that critic, are you conceivably allowed to charge school boards or promoters of learning when you address them? Isn't that what the critic's duties are all about? Isn't that what an MP gets paid to do?

Coming on top of his decision to skip a crucial vote on AIDS drugs for Africa, these revelations make you wonder about Mr. Trudeau's disabled moral compass. Does he know right from wrong?

Of course I wouldn't for a moment want the tawdry revelations about our imploding Senate to cease. For example, the Duff – as Senator Mike Duffy adoringly calls himself – also offers himself as a speaker, his website declaring that he's "much sought-after as a keynote speaker for charity." No doubt. But his fee is not mentioned. We can confidently expect many more headline-making revelations to come from the Senate mausoleum.

But Justin Trudeau wants to be Prime Minister of Canada. He deserves the intense scrutiny that comes with such a heady ambition, and he already has much to answer for.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter