Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

National Chief Shawn Atleo greets attendees at a memorial service to commemorate fallen warriors from 1812 at Fort York in Toronto on Monday, July 16, 2012.

MICHELLE SIU/The Canadian Press

Three votes means a couple of more hours.

Had Shawn Atleo received 321 rather than 318 votes Wednesday afternoon, he would have received 60 per cent of the vote and would have been sworn in by now for a second term as National Chief of the Assembly of First Nations. But it was not quite to be.

It will take a third ballot to seal the re-election deal. But that deal is done.

Story continues below advertisement

Pam Palmater, the Ontario-based lawyer and professor, grew her vote a smidgeon, to 107 from 95, while the other surviving candidates languished in the three-dozen range or below. None of them has the slightest chance of catching the incumbent national chief.

Had the chiefs known Mr. Atleo was this close, some of them no doubt would have changed their votes.

Manitoba Chief Terence Nelson removed himself from the third ballot, throwing his support to Ms. Palmater. But since that support consisted of 25 votes, it made no never mind.

The third ballot should be out by around 6:30 p.m. That should end it.

It was clear from the first ballot result that there was simply no momentum behind any candidate to challenge the incumbent chief.

Not only will Mr. Atleo almost certainly go on to lead the AFN, the result vindicates his policy of co-operation with the Harper government in improving the quality of life on reserves, especially in the area of education.

Mr. Atleo's challengers alleged he had failed to confront the Conservatives in asserting a native veto over the exploitation of natural resources on lands claimed by first nations.

Story continues below advertisement

But with 53 per cent of the vote on the first ballot – just shy of the 60 per cent needed for victory – Mr. Atleo has rebutted that criticism, emphatically. He clearly has the confidence of the chiefs.

Voting for the national chief has been known to go on forever. The contest that elected Mr. Atleo in 2009 lasted 23 hours. That will almost certainly not be the case now.

Mr. Atleo had great strength in British Columbia, whence he hails, and support in Ontario. But the Prairie chiefs are among those most discontented with his leadership.

They want the national chief to be much more in the Harper government's face. The question for those chiefs was, once favourite sons and daughters were eliminated from the ballot, whether they could coalesce around a challenger.

But only Ontario-based lawyer and professor Pam Palmater managed to secure more than three dozen votes in the first round.

This race isn't just Shawn Atleo's to lose. It's his, period.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies