Skip to main content

International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda speaks during Question Period in the House of Commons on Feb. 17, 2011.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Bev Oda stood up in the House and finally spoke, but only in answer to a question on Haiti.

On the matter that has transfixed Parliament Hill all week, the International Co-operation Minister stayed silent in her seat on Thursday, letting others in the government deal with concerted opposition allegations that she has misled the House of Commons.

The Speaker of the House is weighing a joint request from the Liberal Party, the NDP and the Bloc Québécois to launch a process to determine whether Ms. Oda can be found in contempt of Parliament. The government will study the opposition parties' statements before making its own representations, at which point Speaker Peter Milliken will decide whether to send the issue to a parliamentary committee for study.

Story continues below advertisement

The government is hoping the issue will fade from the public eye in the meantime, as the House is not sitting next week. But the Liberals are trying to keep it alive, launching a petition calling for Ms. Oda's resignation.

"This is the government that prorogued Parliament, that shut Parliament down, that silences whistleblowers, that intimidates public servants, and now stands behind a minister who will not tell the truth," Liberal Liberal Michael Ignatieff said in the House.

Speaking in Toronto, Prime Minister Stephen Harper led the government defence of Ms. Oda, who took responsibility this week for ordering the word "not" to be put into a document from the Canadian International Development Agency, thereby reversing a recommendation that the minister offer $7-million in funding to church-backed aid group Kairos.

"We are not obliged to accept the recommendations of bureaucrats and I've been very clear to my ministers that they are responsible for the decisions they make and therefore that [if]they think the recommendation is wrong they have a responsibility to change it," Mr. Harper said.

During a committee appearance in December, Ms. Oda said she did not know who put in the word "not" on the Kairos funding proposal that had been approved by her officials. This week, she changed her story, saying that she had provided the direction for the insertion of the word.

Conservative House Leader John Baird fielded questions on the matter in the House of Commons, stating that Ms. Oda "has more integrity in the tip of her finger" than some of her opposition critics.

The Liberals did manage to get Ms. Oda to answer one question in the House, but it was on the issue of Canadian aid to Haiti. After Ms. Oda stood up, the Liberals immediately returned to the Kairos matter, hoping to get her to confirm their assertion that the Kairos decision was dictated by Mr. Harper's office. She went silent again.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter