Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The House of Commons is pictured on April 9, 2013 on Parliament Hill in Ottawa. The next federal election will be held on Oct. 19, 2015

Dave Chan/The Globe and Mail

The Prime Minister's Office says it is too soon to consider following Britain's lead by recalling Parliament to consider intervention in Syria.

The prospect of U.S.-led western military strikes was heightened Monday, when U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said it is "undeniable" that chemical weapons were used in Syria, and the Assad regime must be held to account.

Stephen Harper spoke Tuesday morning to U.S. President Barack Obama about the situation in Syria, according to the prime minister's office.

Story continues below advertisement

The prime minister's office said Mr. Harper and Mr. Obama agreed that the world needs to deliver a response to the use of chemical weapons in a "timely manner."

"The Prime Minister made it clear that he shares the view that the recent chemical weapons attack was carried out by the Syrian regime and described the use of these weapons as an outrage," the PMO's summary of the call said.

"Both leaders agreed that significant use of chemical weapons merits a firm response from the international community in an effective and timely manner."

British Prime Minister Cameron said Tuesday he would recall Britain's Parliament on Thursday. He tweeted : "There'll be a clear Govt motion & vote on UK response to chemical weapons attacks."

But Mr. Harper's spokesman, Carl Vallée, said there's no rush. "It is premature to discuss recalling Parliament at this time," he said.

Mr. Harper has in fact been planning to delay the return of Parliament, scheduled for Sept. 16, rather than hasten it. He has said he intends to prorogue Parliament, ending the current session, so that he can deliver a Speech from the Throne outlining a new legislative agenda. His aides have signalled they do not expect Parliament to return before mid-October.

In Canada, the government doesn't legally need parliamentary approval to deploy the military – but since 2006, Mr. Harper has made it a practice to hold a vote in the Commons when the Canadian Forces are sent into a conflict.

Story continues below advertisement

He held votes to approve extensions of the Canadian Forces mission in Kandahar, Afghanistan, in 2006 and 2008, and a series of votes were held to back the deployment of fighter jets to conduct airstrikes on Libya in 2011.

But University of Ottawa professor Philippe Lagassé notes that parliament sometimes provides its approval after the government's decision to deploy is already set in stone. Mr. Harper announced Canadian fighters would deploy on the Libya mission in March 2011, but the Commons voted to support it – unanimously – a week later.

Mr. Harper's government had by then already been consulting opposition MPs on possible intervention in Libya, however, and the NDP had in fact taken the lead in pressing the government to intervene there.

Mr. Lagassé said that in Canada, the practice of consulting the Commons remains just that – a practice. In Britain, it is considered a convention, though a flexible one, which means that the government must find some way of honouring the requirement to take their plans to Parliament.

While Mr. Harper's practice of consulting Parliament has been applauded by some, Mr. Lagassé has critiqued it as a political tactic that allows governments to use the opposition as political cover for a decision to deploy the military. "The executive is blurring who took the decision and who's responsible," he said.

Mr. Cameron's assertion that he will take a transparent approach to the British response might underline Mr. Harper's reluctance to discuss intervention before the die is cast.

Story continues below advertisement

In Libya, Mr. Harper's announcement preceded parliamentary debate. It's not clear if the prime minister, facing a potential decision on deployment for the first time since he won a majority government, will bring the matter to Parliament before the decision is made.

The Department of Defence has stymied questions even on publicly known international military meetings where Syria is to be discussed.

U.S. news organizations, including the U.S. Army newspaper, Stars and Stripes, reported Monday that Canadian military officials are among those of 10 countries meeting in Jordan with the Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey. They cited a U.S. Defense Department spokesman who said the meeting is intended to discuss impact of regional conflicts.

But a spokesman for the Canadian Forces, Captain Alexandre Munoz, said the government won't even confirm Canadians are participating in the meetings, nor comment on what is being discussed. U.S. and Jordanian officials told Stars and Stripes that that Syria will be a major topic of discussion.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies