Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Minister of Finance Jim Flaherty speaks in Ottawa on Oct. 22, 2013.

ADRIAN WYLD/The Canadian Press

The surprising revelation last week that Ottawa is almost $7-billion ahead of schedule for eliminating the deficit is attracting the scrutiny of the budget watchdog.

The No. 2 man in the Parliamentary Budget Office says officials have asked the Finance Department for clarification.

"We'll look at it because it will affect our own numbers, and try and figure out what the source of it is," says Mostafa Askari.

Story continues below advertisement

"There's a part we still don't understand ... as to why departments spent less than what they were expected to ... and why they [Finance] didn't see it in March," when the budget was tabled.

In a report last week, the government pegged the deficit for the 2012-13 fiscal year at $18.9-billion, rather than the $25.9-billion estimated in the March budget.

The lion's share of the difference – about $4.9-billion – came from lower program spending, including on the public service.

Askari said one pressing question is whether the savings were largely a one-time occurrence or will flow through to future years.

If the latter, analysts say, Ottawa may be able to balance the budget next year, one year earlier than the 2015 target, a boon for the Harper Conservatives heading into an election year.

The Conservatives have promised to introduce income splitting for tax purposes once the budget is balanced, a measure likely to boost the party's chances in the scheduled 2015 election.

"But at what cost to Canadians?" says NDP finance critic Peggy Nash.

Story continues below advertisement

"This is exactly why the PBO was created and it goes to the heart of accountability for the government. What are the programs and services that have been affected? They won't say."

Nash says she believes Prime Minister Stephen Harper has issued orders to get the budget balanced as quickly as possible to load his campaign platform with goodies, noting that in this month's throne speech, the government pledged more restraint.

Liberal critic Scott Brison says the government's continuing job cuts are a "fatwa" on the public service – politically driven, and not about helping the economy.

When Flaherty was asked why departments hadn't spent their approved limits, he joked: "I think I'm scaring them all."

Some critics speculate Flaherty may have been borrowing the tactics of a famous predecessor, Liberal Paul Martin, who set a low bar to look all the better when good numbers arrived.

In Martin's case, the sizes of surpluses were underestimated, a practice Harper and Flaherty have criticized and pledged to end.

Story continues below advertisement

But former PBO Kevin Page, who has quarrelled with Flaherty in the past, said he doesn't believe the minister is deliberately underpromising on the fiscal numbers.

Page said during the Martin restraint years in the 1990s, officials cut capital expenditures, such as maintenance and upgrades of equipment, but that proved a false economy in the long run. The move only delayed spending to later years and often increased costs.

"I'd worry about the Prime Minister and Finance Minister saying there's too much money in the system, just put the squeeze to it, we don't care how, because we're not going to the election in 2015 with some kind of deficit," he said.

That is becoming increasingly unlikely given the new deficit level, says Scotiabank senior economist Mary Webb, who specializes in federal and provincial finances.

She says the current, lower starting point of $18.9-billion means Flaherty can do much better than the $18.7-billion level he was supposed to get to this fiscal year, which runs to March, making the final leap to balance 2014-2015 possible.

Webb notes that in the March budget, Ottawa forecast the deficit shrinking by $12-billion between the 2013-14 and 2014-15 fiscal years.

Story continues below advertisement

"Let's take an optimistic scenario and say the deficit is down to $10-billion after this year, then the question is can they cut $10-billion in one year. Well they were going to, so why not?"

For that to happen, all would need to go well for the government, she said. And Flaherty himself has noted Ottawa is facing additional costs this year as a result of the Lac-Megantic train derailment and Alberta flooding.

But the minister has also included a sizable $3-billion cushion for "risk" in his projections, so Ottawa is that much closer each year than it is reporting.

Webb says the federal government typically "outperforms its deficit target," so although unlikely, she says there may be another Flaherty surprise down the road.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies