Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper speaks to supporters during a campaign stop in Victoriaville, Que., Friday, September 11, 2015.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

A campaigning Conservative Leader Stephen Harper used Friday's 14th anniversary of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in the U.S. to highlight his government's national-security credentials.

Speaking to an election rally in Victoriaville, Que., Harper flatly asserted that voters face a choice between "security and risk" next month at the polls.

The incumbent Conservatives have been buffeted by an international refugee crisis over the past week, and Harper has been trying to stress the terrorist threat millions of displaced Syrian and Iraqi civilians pose, and hence the need for rigorous screening of newcomers to Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

"On Oct. 19, you will have to choose between experience and the unknown, between security and risk," Harper told a crown of partisans.

"Security and experience, that's what Conservative candidates offer."

The New Democratic Party under Tom Mulcair and Justin Trudeau's Liberals have been hammering the government for failing to speed up the refugee-resettlement process, while Harper has countered by playing to fears of terrorist infiltrators.

With the 78-day election campaign now past its midpoint, the three major federal parties remain locked in a tight three-way battle in most public opinion polls and are trying to separate themselves from the field.

The anniversary of the world-shaking 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington gave Harper an opportunity to remind voters of the subsequent war in Afghanistan — a "difficult and costly campaign," he said in French, but one that means Afghanistan is "no longer a base for terrorism against us."

Nonetheless, he said, the threat remains — a reference to two deadly attacks on Canadian soldiers last fall in Canada. He then pitched his party's wish to keep up air strikes against fighters for the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, also commonly referred to as ISIS or ISIL.

Canada has a half-dozen fighter jets flying bombing missions in Iraq and Syria, and several dozen special-forces military trainers working with Kurdish fighters in Iraq to fight the militants — a commitment that currently extends to March.

Story continues below advertisement

A new iPolitics poll Friday from Ekos Research suggested the Conservative message is in their supporters' comfort zone — and may chew into the Liberal flank.

The survey found 69 per cent of respondents who identified as Conservative supporters felt Canada should "focus on the military mission against ISIS," rather than on humanitarian aid. It's noteworthy that 37 per cent of self-identified Liberal supporters agreed.

The automated telephone poll of 2,677 respondents, which carries a margin of error of 1.9 percentage points, also found that 88 per cent of Conservative respondents felt the current target for Syrian refugees is "about right" or too generous — and 49 per cent of Liberal respondents agreed.

It may help explain the message Harper continues to pound home.

"As long as the most violent and barbarous individuals in the world are committing massacres, as long as they're happy to boast about it, and as long as they continue to threaten to do the same things to Canada and Canadians, this Conservative government will remain in the international coalition fighting ISIS," he said in Victoriaville.

Mulcair, campaigning in Edmonton, said Canada does indeed have a role to play in combating terrorism, but said the government should focus on stopping the flow of arms and money to the region as well as combating radicalization at home.

Story continues below advertisement

He noted the Conservative government has made Canada the only NATO country that's failed to ratify a United Nations treaty on the trade in arms.

Harper, it should be noted, pledged an additional $10 million over five years on Friday to the Kanishka project — a federal initiative aimed at countering "root causes" of terrorism and radicalization in Canada.

Mulcair also defended Fin Donnelly, the NDP incumbent in a B.C. riding who helped publicize the Canadian connection to drowned Syrian three-year-old Alan Kurdi, the tragic poster child of the humanitarian crisis.

Donnelly has been blamed for erroneous reports of the Kurdi family's Canadian refugee appeals, but Mulcair said the MP had been advocating in writing for the whole extended Kurdi family.

"He was doing an amazing job of representing people in his riding, doing his best to save that family," Mulcair said. "That's what MPs do."

In Burnaby, B.C., Trudeau criticized the Conservatives for "playing up the politics of division, of attack or of fear."

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberals managed to protect Canadians' security while balancing that with the country's rights and freedoms immediately after Sept. 11, 2001, Trudeau said.

He also recounted his own experience teaching Grade 9 and 10 students at a Vancouver-area school on the morning of the attacks.

"The questions they asked are not so different from a lot of questions people are asking today: about the nature of world we're growing up in and the kind of future we're building," the Liberal leader said.

Creating a safer world while standing up for Canadian values is, he said, "what we have to keep focused on in the coming years."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies