Skip to main content

Canada has shuttered its embassy in Cairo, taking no chances with the political standoff and mass protests that have left Ottawa wondering where Egypt is headed.

The Conservative government, which was leery of the Arab Spring movement two years ago, is again watching the waves of protesters in Cairo streets with a wary eye.

The Canadian embassy in Cairo, in a central area close to protests in Tahrir Square, was closed at noon Tuesday as a security precaution, said Rick Roth, a spokesman for Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird. No Canadian diplomats had suffered harm, but the embassy will stay closed indefinitely as officials monitor developments, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Ottawa's political position remains cautious, too. On Sunday, Mr. Baird called for Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi to "foster more meaningful political participation" with the opposition, and warned of "dangerous divisions" in Egyptian society. But Ottawa does not want to see an elected president overthrown – even if the federal government has never been enthusiastic about Mr. Morsi, the candidate backed by Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood.

"We call on all parties to remain calm and participate in the political process," Mr. Roth said in an email Tuesday.

The Canadian policy is closely aligned with that of U.S. President Barack Obama, who has urged Mr. Morsi to deal with opponents, but who has also taken pains to note that the U.S. does not support any particular group inside Egypt. Canadian officials have been in contact with U.S. counterparts as they seek to determine how Egypt will handle this conflict.

But Canada has virtually no pull in Egypt. The government's cool reaction to the Arab Spring protests was poorly received in Cairo. While several other Western governments offered aid programs, Canada declined. Relations with Mr. Morsi's government have remained distant, at best.

However, the federal government has in recent months steered clear of delving too deeply into Egyptian politics, declining, for example, to take sides over a constitutional referendum in December that also sparked protests – and is reluctant to embrace a street movement aimed at pushing an elected president from power.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter