Skip to main content

The value of the Canadian dollar and the price of oil, one of the nation's top exports, have both tumbled to near record lows. But those details – and the apparent demise of the Keystone XL pipeline – don't begin to tell the story of what lies ahead for the economy of Canada, America's second-largest trading partner.

Last year, Canadian voters elected an energetic and pragmatic prime minister, Justin Trudeau. He campaigned on a platform of inclusion and tolerance, focusing on the need to bring people together to solve problems, including pulling the country out of its economic doldrums. His youthful energy and optimism have inspired comparisons to John F. Kennedy, and like Kennedy, he is promising to cut middle-class taxes and tackle the biggest scientific challenge of his time, which today is climate change.

Trudeau's commitment to fighting climate change coincides with his recognition that the Canadian economy has been too dependent on oil for too long. The good news for Trudeau is that the market shares his view, as local governments are proving.

Story continues below advertisement

In the United States, cities are often on the leading edge of change; in Canada, cities and provinces serve the same function. The most populous province, Ontario, has begun a 10-year, $130-billion program to improve its roads, transit and hospitals. The bonds sold to pay for those investments have been outperforming the national average, including in oil-rich Alberta. Investors have decided that governments with strong infrastructure are a better bet than those that are dependent on fossil fuels – and they are right.

Trudeau is committed to increasing investment in low-carbon infrastructure and clean-energy technology (Canadian Solar has become the one of the world's largest manufacturers of solar panels), and market returns indicate that investors agree. So do local leaders. Cities from Montreal to Vancouver have set aggressive targets for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, and they are allowing the public to hold them accountable by making those targets public through the Compact of Mayors, a standardized reporting platform that more than 400 cities around the world have committed to. Various provinces have also adopted carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems.

By prioritizing greater investment in a low-carbon economy, Trudeau is swimming with the market's currents and local government trends. And those investments will help address another challenge facing the Canadian economy: individual and corporate cash reserves, which now stand at more than $500-billion. As more infrastructure is built, more private-sector investment will follow, drawing more funds back into the market, which will spur more economic growth – and tax revenue. With interest rates at sustained record lows, there has never been a better period for governments to borrow money to pay for new transit, schools and hospitals – an opportunity the U.S. government has mostly missed.

Canada faces its share of challenges, and whether the national government can live up to its carbon emission reduction targets will depend largely on how successful its bottom-up approach proves to be. But locally led actions that are aligned with market forces have the potential to drive a new era of growth and investment. Strong economic leadership, as Trudeau seems to understand, does not begin with protectionist or socialist policies that vilify scapegoats. It begins with uniting people around a hopeful and realistic vision that can be fulfilled if government works in concert with markets.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies