Skip to main content

Canadian Heritage Melanie Joly has relinquished absolute control over funding decisions.

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Having the final sign-off on all cheques has long been emblematic of the minister's absolute power over cultural grants and contributions at Canadian Heritage.

But Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly has decided to forfeit that power and allow her bureaucrats to approve 90 per cent of the 8,000 grants and contributions that the department awards each year.

In addition, Ms. Joly has decided to allow cultural groups to sign more multiyear agreements with Canadian Heritage, freeing them up from the obligation to send in an application every year for ministerial approval.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Joly said the measures will limit political considerations in the awarding of funding, such as favouring areas that voted for the government in power.

"There was often a lot of discretion built into our various programs, and that sometimes allowed for a more partisan approach," Ms. Joly said at an event with reporters and representatives of cultural groups on Wednesday. "It's not normal for some ridings not to receive any funding, when groups have a right to that money. It's normal for us to support arts groups across the country."

Historically, Ms. Joly said, ministers and their political staff rejected only about 2 per cent of the grants and contributions that had been approved by the bureaucracy. Still, she said partisan officials should not have the right to overturn the decisions of bureaucrats who operate in the same regions as the recipients and have greater knowledge of local needs and priorities.

Under the new system, Ms. Joly will continue to sign off on all funding awarded as part of next year's celebrations of Canada's 150th anniversary, and all deals worth more than $75,000, which account for about 10 per cent of the department's annual output.

She said she needs to retain a role on bigger projects, given that demand for funding is much larger than her department's budget.

"On some projects, I have to be able to have discussions with municipal and provincial authorities," she said.

The minister said allowing bureaucrats to sign off on most deals will speed up the process by weeks or even months in some cases, bringing down the level of "anxiety" among recipients.

Story continues below advertisement

To make things more efficient, the government will use bank transfers instead of cheques to send the money to recipients.

Canadian Heritage is also moving toward greater openness by posting all of its grants and contributions on its website, regardless of the amount of funding.

The new measures were welcomed by some of the groups that receive funding from Canadian Heritage, including the Canadian Arts Presenting Association.

"Having stable funding will increase our ability to create and innovate," said association spokesman Frédéric Julien.

Giving more say to bureaucrats, and speeding up the approval process, will make a difference to groups working in French-language communities outside of Quebec, added Maggy Razafimbahiny of the Fédération culturelle canadienne-française.

"These measures are a nice surprise for our members. We've never seen anything like this," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Joly said the new measures come as the federal government is increasing its spending in arts and culture, with an influx of $1.9-billion over five years in the past budget.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.