Skip to main content

Plainclothes contractors working for Blackwater take part in a firefight on April 4, 2004, in the Iraqi city of Najaf.

Gervasio Sanchez/AP

Canadian troops and police were trained for two years by the international security contractor formerly known as Blackwater without the permission of the U.S. State Department.

The revelation is contained in U.S. federal court records, unsealed in North Carolina as part of a $7.5-million settlement of criminal charges against the company now called Academi LLC.

It is the second time Canada's association with the notorious security company, often described as the world's largest mercenary army, has arisen in a complex legal case that has been churning its way through U.S. courts.

Story continues below advertisement

Blackwater, which changed its name to Xe Services before being sold and becoming Academi LLC, was cited in August, 2010, for the unauthorized export of technical data to the Canadian military.

The Harper government has had a standing contract with the company since 2008.

It's paid millions of dollars going back to 2006 for specialized training provided to special forces troops and some police officers.

U.S. prosecutors say Blackwater didn't seek the permission required under American arms control laws for the instruction, which took place between 2006 and 2008 and included training in marksmanship, defensive driving, bodyguard and close combat skills.

The company had a myriad of subsidiaries.

Some of what Blackwater companies taught the Canadian military involved the company's "Mirror Image" course, according to court documents filed in Raleigh, N.C. The program sees trainees living as a mock al-Qaeda cell to better understand the mindset and culture of insurgents.

It is a "classroom and field training program designed to simulate terrorist recruitment, training, techniques and operational tactics," said a Blackwater brochure.

Story continues below advertisement

The course was offered by the now-defunct Blackwater subsidiary Terrorism Research Centre, which in addition to the immersion-like training provided advice to governments and U.S. cities on intelligence-gathering. The centre was shut down by the new owners.

Much of the public attention on Blackwater has focused on the 2007 deaths of 17 Iraqis in Baghdad after an attack on a diplomatic convoy protected by Blackwater guards.

But the company's advice and potential involvement in the murky world of intelligence gathering for both government and corporations has been the subject of growing scrutiny over the past few years.

National Defence and the government have over the years defended their association with Blackwater, saying the courses and instruction were necessary and unavailable anywhere else.

A spokeswoman in Defence Minister Peter MacKay's office issued a one-line email statement, saying it was "appropriate training" to ensure that soldiers had "skills required to survive a very difficult military mission in Afghanistan."

Officials within the department declined further comment, but a defence expert who has written extensively on the shadowy ventures of private security companies called the revelations troubling.

Story continues below advertisement

Dave Perry of Carleton University's Centre for Security and Defence Studies said whenever it's gotten into trouble, Blackwater always insisted it was carrying out business in compliance with U.S. foreign policy.

"It potentially brings into question whether they were actually doing that, if they weren't going through the formal channels to get approval for something as relatively mundane as training," Mr. Perry said.

The NDP's Jack Harris said his party has long opposed the training.

"What else don't we know that's going on without the knowledge or consent of the Canadian people?" Mr. Harris asked.

The idea that technical data was transferred to Canada also grabbed Mr. Perry's attention. He wonders what it was the U.S. thought was so sensitive that it could be shared with a private contractor, but not with its closest neighbour and military ally.

Mr. Perry said the court case raises more questions about the government's association and believes the revelations may only be the tip of the iceberg, given that Blackwater had over 30 different subsidiaries.

Story continues below advertisement

"I don't think we have a full appreciation of the full range of services" offered to Canada by the company, he said.

Asked if the Canadian public has yet to learn the full story, Mr. Perry replied: "I think that's fair to say."

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter