Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Commons approves bill to ban masks during violent protests

Masked protesters take part in an anti-capitalist demonstration in Montreal, Tuesday, May 1, 2012.


It's not a trick – and for would-be masked rioters, it's no treat, either.

While tens of thousands of children are putting the final touches on Halloween costumes and masks, the House of Commons has approved a bill banning people from hiding their faces during riots.

The private member's legislation, Bill C-309, is the brainchild of Alberta Conservative backbencher Blake Richards.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Richards says it's a response to last year's Stanley Cup riots in Vancouver, when often-masked vandals rampaged through the streets after their team's Game 7 loss to the Boston Bruins.

The bill provides a penalty of up to 10 years in prison for anyone convicted of covering their face during a riot or other unlawful assembly.

The bill – which won't apply to those attending peaceful protests or demonstrations – passed by a margin of 153-126, with the government in support and the NDP and Liberals opposed.

During the Commons debate on the bill, New Democrat MP Charmaine Borg cited civil liberties concerns in opposing the measure.

"I would also like to point out that this bill takes away an individual's right to demonstrate anonymously," she said.

"An individual is not necessarily going to commit a crime just because he or she is wearing a mask at a riot. It is reasonable to think that the person just wants to remain anonymous and protect his or her identity."

Mr. Richards scorned that view.

Story continues below advertisement

"Anyone who is wearing a mask or a disguise to conceal his or her face in the midst of a riot is exhibiting aggravating behaviour," he said.

He said law-abiding citizens caught up in violence will naturally tend to want to leave the area.

"It is hard to imagine that others who ignore police instructions to depart the area and who, in addition, continue to linger in the vicinity while wearing a disguise are seized by any innocent motives or good intentions in those kind of circumstances."

The bill does not apply to protests or demonstrations and contains a "lawful excuse" clause which would protect people who cover their faces for religious or cultural reasons.

Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair called the bill redundant.

"The police already have all the tools they need," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

Liberal Sean Casey said the legislation is just another part of the Conservative law-and-order fixation.

"It is as if the Conservatives lie awake at night dreaming about ways to put more and more people in prison," Mr. Casey said during the debate. "It is an obsession rooted not in science or evidence, or even reason. It is irrational."

Report an error

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨