Skip to main content

Crews prepare a boom on the Gleniffer reservoir to stop oil from a pipeline leak near Sundre, Alta., on June 8, 2012. Plains Midstream Canada says one of their non-functioning pipelines leaked between 1,000-3,000 barrels of oil.

Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press

A day after announcing new safety measures for tankers, the federal government has introduced tougher regulations for pipelines, taking a "big step" toward meeting British Columbia's requirements for approving projects to the West Coast.

Under the changes, the National Energy Board will be given increased regulatory control over the 73,000 kilometres of pipeline that transport more than $100-billion worth of oil, gas and petroleum products across Canada each year.

The new regulations, announced Wednesday by Natural Resources Minister Greg Rickford and Transport Minister Lisa Raitt, require the NEB to increase the number of oil and gas pipeline inspections by 50 per cent annually and to double the number of yearly safety audits.

Story continues below advertisement

The government will also establish absolute liability for pipeline companies by making them responsible for cleanups, whether or not they are to blame for the accidents.

Mr. Rickford announced that all major pipeline companies would need to keep $1-billion on hand to deal with potential oil spills. The proposed legislation would also provide the National Energy Board with clear authority to ensure cleanups are properly managed.

Mr. Rickford also said his government will move to involve First Nations in safety planning and spill response, saying they must play a "key, integral, absolutely critical role" in energy development.

He denied the announcements over the past two days are aimed at Enbridge Inc.'s Northern Gateway project, which is currently before cabinet awaiting a decision on whether it can proceed.

"This is not tied to a specific project," Mr. Rickford said.

However, taken together with the new tanker safety regulations announced Tuesday, the measures are clearly aimed at satisfying some of the five requirements B.C. has set for pipeline approval.

B.C. has said any new pipelines must successfully complete an environmental review; must meet "world-leading" standards for both marine and land oil-spill response and prevention; must address First Nations concerns and must give B.C. "a fair share" of the economic benefits.

Story continues below advertisement

There are currently two oil pipeline projects proposed in B.C. In addition to the Enbridge proposal, Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain project would twin an existing pipeline from Alberta to Burnaby.

B.C. Transport Minister Todd Stone, who attended the Vancouver news conference, described the federal government's announcement as "very important," but he stopped short of saying provincial requirements have been met.

In Victoria, Premier Christy Clark said the announcement is evidence the rest of Canada is starting to understand B.C.'s concerns about heavy oil pipeline development.

"I think having world-leading national standards is a big step," she said, but added that Ottawa will need to ensure that the regulatory details are put in place. "There are a lot more steps that need to be taken. You can set a national standard but whether an individual project meets that standard is a completely different question."

She said the announcement is a response to B.C.'s concerns.

"It has been a process of education," Ms. Clark said. "British Columbia is a long way from Ottawa and it has taken a little bit of time to make sure everybody in the country understood why in British Columbia we are so concerned about protecting our coastline and our land base."

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta Premier Dave Hancock applauded the federal announcement, saying the actions "build on the principles of prevention, liability and preparedness, and also recognize that meaningful aboriginal participation in pipeline safety discussions is imperative."

With a report from Shawn McCarthy in Ottawa

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter