Skip to main content

During Question Period, Prime Minister Stephen Harper slammed the Official Opposition for putting up a fight to obtain greater scrutiny of the legislation.

CHRIS WATTIE/REUTERS

The Conservatives have agreed to triple the number of parliamentary hearings into the government's anti-terrorism legislation under pressure from an NDP filibuster for additional expert testimony on Bill C-51.

The Conservatives voted on Thursday to hold nine meetings on the matter at the public safety committee of the House between March 9 and 31, up from an initial proposal of three meetings. This will bring to 50 the number of witnesses who will speak on the proposed legislation, including Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney and Justice Minister Peter MacKay.

The government is arguing it must move quickly on the matter, as reports continue to come in of Canadians travelling to the Middle East to join Islamic State extremists. The latest case involves six young Montrealers who recent left the country and are thought to have become radicalized.

Story continues below advertisement

Bill C-51 would beef up the powers of Canada's spy agency, criminalize the promotion of terrorism and make it easier to stop Canadians from joining terrorist groups abroad.

The NDP has been leading the opposition to the proposal, arguing it offers unnecessary powers to law-enforcement agencies and puts law-abiding citizens at risk of being ensnared in the anti-terror fight.

During Question Period, Prime Minister Stephen Harper slammed the Official Opposition for putting up a fight to obtain greater scrutiny of the legislation.

"Now is not the time for the NDP agenda of attacking the police and the security agencies," Mr. Harper said. "Now it is time to take on the terrorists, and that is what we are doing."

NDP MPs were filibustering the committee meeting in a bid to force the Conservatives to agree to hold 25 meetings in March. The NDP argued the Conservative schedule would cram too many witnesses at each hearing, leaving them only 20 minutes on average to make their case.

"We are not asking for delay, we are asking to do more work on this bill," NDP MP Randall Garrison said. "We believe it is important to get this right."

The NDP will now be able to invite about one third of the witnesses at the committee, with NDP MP Rosane Doré Lefebvre stating the list will include retired judges, members of First Nations and retired law-enforcement officials.

Story continues below advertisement

She said the fact the Conservatives agreed to increase the number of hearings was a "small victory" for the NDP. She now hopes the government will listen to the experts and make changes to the legislation.

"It's difficult to pass amendments with the Conservative government," she said. "For anything to happen, it must come from both sides. We need to come to a consensus that this is not the time for politics but a serious matter of national security."

The NDP has already stated that it will vote against C-51 unless it wins substantial amendments to the legislation.

The chair of the public safety committee of the House argued on Thursday it was time to study the legislation, instead of debating the number of witnesses that will be heard.

"Time is of the essence," said Conservative MP Daryl Kramp. "I don't want Rome to burn when Nero fiddles. The terrorism threat is real."

Mr. Harper urged the committee to quickly complete its study of Bill C-51 on Thursday, noting the legislation is "strongly supported by Canadians."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter