Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says cash-for-access fundraisers will now be open for public scrutiny, but is not lowering the up to $1,500 ticket price

Chris Bolin/Reuters

Federal opposition parties who led the attack on the Trudeau government's cash-for-access fundraising are now dismissing Liberal changes that would lift the veil of secrecy from this moneymaking, calling the proposal cosmetic.

The Conservatives and the New Democrats declined to say whether they support the Liberal government's plan to extend these changes so they would also apply to opposition party leaders. Both parties said they wanted to first study the legislation when it is released.

As The Globe and Mail reported Friday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will crack down on cash-for-access fundraising by passing legislation that addresses criticism the Liberal Party has been offering privileged access to wealthy donors who pay as much as $1,500 for tickets. It would require future fundraisers featuring cabinet ministers to be transparent, open to public scrutiny and reported to Canadians.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Trudeau to end controversial cash-for-access fundraisers

Read more: Elections commissioner urged to investigate cash-for-access allegations

Read more: Cash-for-access organizers sought payments that exceeded federal contribution limits

Interim Conservative leader Rona Ambrose said a new law will not make these fundraisers – where Mr. Trudeau has acknowledged to being lobbied – more ethical.

"I don't think we need new legislation," Ms. Ambrose told a news conference in Quebec City, adding current ethical guidelines are adequate but are not being followed. Existing rules, such as the Open and Accountable Government policy championed by Mr. Trudeau in 2015, do not have the force of law and only apply to cabinet ministers and not opposition party leaders or leadership candidates.

The proposed Liberal legislation is designed to eliminate the elite, behind-closed-doors conditions that could lead to lobbying by requiring that all fundraisers featuring cabinet ministers are publicly advertised ahead of time, that they take place in publicly accessible venues rather than private homes or clubs, and that a report on how many attended and how much was raised is released in a timely manner.

The Liberal Party will also commit to allowing journalists to attend all of their fundraising events featuring cabinet ministers and says it will be up to the Conservatives and NDP and other parties to similarly pledge such openness.

Story continues below advertisement

"We believe in providing Canadians with more open, transparent information about political fundraising that involves cabinet ministers, party leaders and leadership candidates," Democratic Institutions Minister Karina Gould said Friday. "We will bring forward a plan to do just that. I'm looking forward to working with parliamentarians to make political fundraising more open and accountable."

Queen's University economist Christopher Cotton applauded the Liberal government for moving to take party fundraising out of the shadows and make it accountable to the public.

"It is a pretty good idea because the cash-for-access fundraisers – ticketed private fundraisers – certainly create the perception of corruption amongst the public," he said. "The idea that those with money have greater access and greater influence over policy and that they are given priority – so it makes sense the government wants to reduce this perception."

A Liberal Party spokesman said the party is preparing to run ministerial fundraising events from now on under the proposed new rules. "The Liberal Party of Canada has already started work to ensure that future fundraising events that feature Mr. Trudeau or other Liberal MPs who serve as ministers will be hosted in publicly available spaces and meet even higher standards for transparency, including advance posting, timely reporting of event details and facilitating press coverage," party spokesman Braeden Caley said.

NDP Leader Tom Mulcair said the fact the Liberals have come forward with changes is an admission Mr. Trudeau's party has been doing something wrong. He called on the Liberals to refund the millions of dollars they have raised since taking office 16 months ago.

"If the Liberals are admitting that their cash-for-access events were wrong, will they be returning all the money they raised?" Mr. Mulcair asked in a statement. "If Justin Trudeau suddenly believes that the fundraisers he held during his leadership race were wrong, will he be returning all of that money? Or is this just what it looks like, a cynical game to distract from Liberals helping themselves?"

Story continues below advertisement

He said the problem still remains that the Liberals will be collecting as much as $1,550 from Canadians in exchange for events with cabinet ministers. That amount is the 2017 individual limit on annual donations to a federal political party.

"Let's also be clear, there is nothing here that actually bans selling access to ministers, which is the overarching problem."

The Liberals' legislative initiative is in response to a series of revelations in The Globe and Mail that showed Mr. Trudeau and senior cabinet members were raising millions of dollars through private fundraisers with tickets as high as $1,500 that gave donors access to his cabinet outside of the glare of public scrutiny.

Ms. Ambrose said opening up the existing system to more scrutiny is not the solution. "That's not the issue. The issue is selling influence. It's asking people to pay to meet with government officials to discuss government business."

"All Mr. Trudeau has to do is stop having cash-for-access events," the Conservative leader said.

Opposition parties have called on Mr. Trudeau to transfer responsibility for the government's Open and Accountable Government guidelines – currently policed by a central agency that reports to the Prime Minister – to the Conflict of Interest Act. That would give the Office of the Ethics Commissioner the legislative clout to police and investigate political fundraisers.

Story continues below advertisement

Prof. Cotton at Queen's said he agreed with opposition parties on this.

NDP ethics critic Alexandre Boulerice is preparing to table a private member's bill shortly that will toughen rules around fundraisers with cabinet ministers and give the Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner more power to investigate these events.

The Liberals were accused in recent months of quietly holding private fundraisers featuring Mr. Trudeau or key cabinet ministers that targeted wealthy business people, including some from the Chinese-Canadian community.

The party's fundraising practices over 2015 and 2016 also ran counter to internal Liberal Party rules, held up by the party as evidence of due diligence, that say "there is a thorough process to ensure that the rules are followed – especially that no department stakeholder, lobbyist, or employees of lobbying firms are specially targeted for fundraising."

In mid-December, Mr. Trudeau himself conceded people lobbied him at the fundraisers but said he ultimately made up his own mind as to what policy is good for Canadians.

Days later, the Ethics Commissioner announced she would question the Prime Minister to determine whether Mr. Trudeau breached the Conflict of Interest Act when he attended party fundraisers with corporate executives wanting favours from Ottawa.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies