Skip to main content

The RCMP say their time-honoured muskrat hat will continue to be issued to officers working in extreme cold

Ken Gigliotti/CP PHOTO/Winnipeg Free Press

A move by the Mounties to doff their fur hats in favour of more animal-friendly tuques has been overturned by the federal Conservatives.

Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq told the House of Commons on Tuesday that the public safety minister had directed the Mounties to reverse the decision.

The RCMP wrote to an animal-rights group in early August to say they had tested a tuque that works well in normal winter conditions, and that they would supply the new hat to cadets as early as this fall.

Story continues below advertisement

The Mounties said their time-honoured muskrat hat would continue to be issued to officers working in extreme cold, stressing that the force and its garment suppliers comply with an international agreement on humane trapping standards.

However, in its letter to the Association for the Protection of Fur-Bearing Animals, the RCMP said the overall result would be a "significant reduction" in the number of fur hats worn by members.

"We have listened to the views of external interested parties and of our employees," wrote RCMP Corps Sergeant-Major Darren Campbell.

"RCMP officers stationed in areas that are not considered extreme will be issued the winter tuque only. Those that will require the fur hat will have to request approval and authority from their line officers in order to obtain the fur hat."

The association says muskrats are caught in body-gripping traps, which can leave them exposed to the elements and predators, and prone to dehydration, starvation and self-inflicted injuries before they die.

A single fur hat like that traditionally worn by the RCMP requires at least three muskrat pelts, the association adds.

The historic fur hats worn by the RCMP "will not be discontinued, despite the efforts of the radical animal-rights activists," said Ms. Aglukkaq, a staunch supporter of the fur industry who hails from Nunavut.

Story continues below advertisement

"The RCMP decision, which is causing much glee among anti-fur activists, is being fully overturned. Our government will always stand up for Canada's hunters and trappers."

The RCMP referred questions Tuesday to Public Safety Canada.

Association spokesman Michael Howie heard the news with "a combination of shock and disgust."

"The RCMP made a decision based on facts, scientific testing and the collective attitudes of their members and the public," Mr. Howie said. "The government of Canada is clearly trying to pander to a dwindling industry and disregarding the rest of the country's views."

In the Commons, Conservative MP Robert Sopuck said the "egregious anti-fur decision by the RCMP" had threatened to devastate thousands of livelihoods.

"The fur trade is vital to the economy of many remote rural communities – communities who often have few other economic options."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Howie said the majority of Canada's fur cultivation actually takes place on factory farms where hundreds of thousands of mink and fox are kept in tiny cages and slaughtered for their skin.

The association has launched an online petition demanding the government honour the RCMP's original decision.

"Interfering with what the public clearly believes in is what is disrespectful here," Howie said. "And right now, we are disgusted with our government."

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter