Skip to main content

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney answers a question during Question Period in the House of Commons in Ottawa, Tuesday, May 5, 2015.

Adrian Wyld/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Conservative government's anti-terrorism legislation has passed its final vote in the House of Commons, clearing the way for the bill to become law before Parliament rises for the summer.

The third-reading vote passed 183 to 96 with the support of Conservative and Liberal Members of Parliament, and was opposed by New Democrats and Green Party Leader Elizabeth May. NDP MP Randall Garrison's proposed amendment to essentially gut the bill was rejected 183 to 95.

(For more on Bill C-51, read The Globe and Mail's in-depth explainer: Privacy, security and terrorism: Taking a closer look at Bill C-51)

Story continues below advertisement

Public Safety Minister Steven Blaney applauded the passage of the legislation. "The [act] will provide our police forces with the tools they need to protect Canadians against serious and evolving threats from terrorist organizations like ISIS," he said.

Bill C-51, the Anti-Terrorism Act, gives police new powers of preventive arrest, allows spy agencies new abilities to "disrupt" threats and broadens the scope of the no-fly list that bars some travellers from boarding planes.

The bill also eases the transfer of information between some federal agencies and criminalizes the promotion of a terrorist attack.

Conservatives say the bill is necessary to combat the threat of terrorism. Prime Minister Stephen Harper has cited attacks in Ottawa and Quebec last October in promoting the legislation.

Bill C-51 faced an organized campaign to put pressure on MPs – particularly those from the Liberal Party – to vote against it. Critics, including the privacy commissioner, four former prime ministers and author Margaret Atwood, say the bill does not provide proper oversight and could affect the privacy of ordinary Canadians.

"Terrorism is a very real threat, but it is the responsibility of the government to protect both public safety and our civil liberties. This bill is vague, dangerous and won't make Canadians safer," Mr. Garrison said in a statement after the vote.

In March, the Conservatives offered amendments to allay some concerns with the bill, which included making sure lawful protests were not targeted.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Harper's national security adviser, Richard Fadden, dismissed those concerns before a parliamentary defence committee in April. He said non-governmental organizations will not become the target of counterterrorism agencies.

"A number of people in the media and elsewhere have been reported as saying, 'The Girl Guides will be hit next.' Well, there has to be an actual threat to national security," Mr. Fadden said.

The bill is expected to pass the Conservative-dominated Senate and receive royal assent before legislators break for the summer in June. After that, Parliament is not likely to resume before a federal election that is scheduled for Oct. 19.

With a report from Daniel Leblanc

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.