Skip to main content

Back on top

He was the bland, business-like counterpoint to the charismatic Gerard Kennedy, building support throughout the 1996 leadership race. Over the course of five ballots, Dalton McGuinty climbed from fourth place to best Mr. Kennedy by 140 votes.

A big-tent approach, with promises of both fiscal responsibility and improved social spending, won Mr. McGuinty the day in the 2003 provincial election. He trounced the Tories, winning 72 of the legislature's 103 seats.

Story continues below advertisement

Peace in our time

The Liberals achieved labour peace in Mr. McGuinty's first term, making deals with doctors and other provincial employees, while ensuring teachers' contracts with local boards were also settled smoothly.

Time to rebuild

After the austerity of the Tory years, the Liberals put money into both health care and education, cutting wait times and class sizes and introducing all-day kindergarten.

A second majority

It was an unusual tack for a man who had built his image as a stable, low-key "Premier Dad," but in the 2007 election, the Liberals used a wedge issue – the Progressive Conservatives' support for funding religious schools – as an effective bludgeon to beat back the Tory tide. Mr. McGuinty retained his large majority.

Resurrecting transit

Story continues below advertisement

The province finally put money into expanding public transit, a long-neglected file, committing billions of dollars to build light-rail transit in Toronto and busways in the suburbs.

The lows:

Portrayed as inexperienced and wooden by his opponents, Mr. McGuinty struggled to sell himself as a potential premier during the 1999 election. Although his party made gains in the vote, the Tories won a comfortable majority.

Two successive provincial agencies, Smart Systems for Health and eHealth Ontario, burned through hundreds of millions of dollars trying to digitize medical records, but made little progress. In 2009, eHealth's CEO resigned, followed a few months later by Health Minister David Caplan, after it was revealed that the agency had doled out no-bid contracts.

On election night in 2011, Mr. McGuinty came up just one seat short of a majority, forcing him to rely on the NDP to hold on to power in the legislature. He could, however, count himself lucky that it had not turned out worse: Some precampaign polls had shown him losing outright.

The Liberals' carefully cultivated relationship with unions unravelled in the face of successive budget deficits. Looking to rein in spending, Mr. McGuinty's government froze teacher salaries and announced plans to do the same with other public-sector workers this year, prompting some labour leaders to vow to go to the mats with the party that had relied on them for support.

Story continues below advertisement

What seemed like clever moves in an election year, putting the kibosh on unpopular gas plants in the Toronto suburbs, turned into a headache for Mr. McGuinty when the cost of the cancellations, at least $230-million, became public.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies