Skip to main content

Quebec Education Minister Line Beauchamp responds to questions over tuition hikes and the ongoing conflicts with students, Monday, April 30, 2012 at the legislature press gallery in Quebec City.

Jacques Boissinot/Jacques Boissinot/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The tentative deal that promised a welcome end to the three-month-long confrontation over tuition-fee hikes in Quebec has run head-on into a wall of student resistance, sending the government scrambling to salvage a fast-deteriorating situation.

Students in a half dozen colleges and 10 university faculties and departments voted to reject the agreement on Monday after the Charest government boasted of having won the battle. Students at other schools are set to vote on the deal throughout the week, but the trend is clearly running against it.

The agreement, reached Saturday, called for allowing the $254-a-year tuition fee hike to be offset by an equivalent reduction in administrative surcharges through tighter controls on the way universities are managed. A special committee would be set up to examine university spending practices and identify savings that would go to eliminating the fee hike.

Story continues below advertisement

But on Sunday, Education Minister Line Beauchamp said the government had stuck to its principle of not abandoning tuition-fee hikes. In a TV interview, she said there was no guarantee that universities would be able to cut enough fat in their budgets to reduce the level of surcharges needed to compensate for the tuition increases, and she repeated the message in an e-mail to all Liberal members of the National Assembly.

Leaders of the student movement demanded that the agreement be clarified to include the government's verbal commitment, made at the bargaining table, that reductions in surcharges as well as all savings made by the universities would go to lowering tuition fees.

And they contend that the minister's comments inflamed an already heated debate over an agreement which, from the outset, failed to meet the students' demands for a freeze on the fee hikes.

"The comments made by the government have done nothing to appease the confrontation. That was not what we agreed to at the bargaining table," said Martine Desjardins, president of the Quebec federation of university students. "It has contributed to sabotaging the deal."

On Monday, in the wake of mounting protests and more student demonstrations in Montreal, Ms. Beauchamp began back-tracking, insisting the issue would eventually be resolved by the new committee.

"Will the savings erase the totality of tuition fees? No one can answer that question," Ms. Beauchamp told The Canadian Press. "It seems that students are under the impression that by voting in favour of the agreement they are abandoning their demands for a freeze on tuition or a tuition-free university system. That is not the case."

Ms. Desjardins and other student leaders expressed little optimism that the agreement would be approved in its current form. And a rejection of the deal would only prolong the social crisis, with no resolution in sight.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter